Epstein Secrets

ion, and failed to produce them during the Palm Beach Police Department's initial investigation. Unable to get work as a house manager elsewhere in South Florida, he says, a later tried to sell this "golden nugget"—his term—for $50,000, to be used in the victims' civil suits. Unfortunately, he made the offer

ur Office prevails on that issue, the victims would obviously have no claim under the CVRA. The victims would then pursue their appellate rights in the Eleventh Circuit. If, however, the victims prevail on that issue, then your Office would take "no position" on the remedy sought by the victims for the violation of

ing for yourself, and Southern District of Florida? A. I can't say that. It was certainly my understanding that somebody had touched base with South Florida who wanted the information, and I assumed, and I continued to assume that nobody would have— I certainly would not have asked Mr. Harvey to make

h Cir.1970), and more • nay by the Fourth Circuit, Air Transit NLRB, 879 F2d 1101 (4th Cir.1982), Board sought to impose the same infes- tation on the Eleventh Circuit. The effort is to no avail. [24] We hold that the daily lessees are independent contractors and not employees of the Company and contrary findin

ion, and failed to produce them during the Palm Beach Police Department's Initial Investigation. Unable to get work as a house manager elsewhere in South Florida, he says, Rodriguez later tried to sell this 'golden nugget'—his term—for $50,000, to be used in the victims' civil suits. Unfortunately, he made th

ur Office prevails on that issue, the victims would obviously have no claim under the CVRA. The victims would then pursue their appellate rights in the Eleventh Circuit. If, however, the victims prevail on that issue, then your Office would take "no position" on the remedy sought by the victims for the violation of

ereto for appellate purposes; 4. That there is currently in excess of Sl0,000,000.0Q of funds clearly belonging to JONES frozen In various banks in South Florida pursuant to prior orders of this and other courts; 5. That these funds are not to be moved under any circumstances absent further order or this Cou

L/slm I Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down prior to September 30, 1981, are binding as precedent in the Eleventh Circuit, Sag Bonner v. City of Prichard, Ala., 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 (11th Cir. 1981). K&E 19439748.2 EFTA00193952 EFTA00193953