Epstein Secrets

ument 402 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2009 Page 8 of 26 L.M., Plaintiff, V. IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________ ____;/ EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PROHIBIT INA

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 402 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2009 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ______________ _

h fully set forth herein. 32. On or about the dates enumerated as to each count listed below, the exact dates A being unknown to the Grand Jury, Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the Defendants listed below did knowingly, in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, r

if any of the victims identified in the federal investigation file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and the subject matter. Epstein will not contest that the identified victims are persons who,

AND ADJUDGED that Petitioners' Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement (DE 28) is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in West Palm Beach, Pain Beach County, Florida, this lr day of February, 2008. Copies furnished to: all counsel of record 09/12/2019 KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

l would like to refer to the non-prosecution agreement in a parallel civil suit that is pending before this court. See Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 08-CW- 80893-MARRA-JOHNSON. To facilitate all these discussions, the non-prosecution agreement 09/12/2019

be sealed, according to a transcript of the hearing. And so it was. But Florida rules of judicial admin- istration, as well as rules of the Palm : Beach County court’ system, require | \ public notification that a court document | ' thas been or will be sealed, meaning kept | from public view. The rules also

rms of possible sex trafficking, was Epstein’s relationship with Jean Luc Brunel, owner of the MC2 modeling agency. According to a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, an alleged victim said that Epstein, Maxwell, Brunel, Rodriguez, and Marcinkova “deliberately engaged in a patt

05-CI-2008) UNCLASSIFIED FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Precedence; ROUTINE To: Miami International Operations Attn: Attn: Date: 10/19/2008 Beach County RA SA Americas Unit From: Bogota Contact: ALA? , 011-571-315-2124 Approved By: Drafted By: Case ID #: 1888-MM-105207-D (Pending) 31E-MM-108

M-108062, 05/31/2008 0 there to interview She was then provided with a copy of a Grand Jury Subpoena issued by the Southern District of Florida, United States District Court, 701 Clemantis Street, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 to appear before the grand jury on June 3, 2008. stated that she would speak to her attorney

. S 34 EFTA00225249 (208) On or about January 1, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, a, and traveled from Anguilla, British West Indies tt item Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. (209) On or about January 6, 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN traveled from Tet

if any of the victims identified in the federal investigation file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and the subject matter. Epstein will not contest that the identified victims are persons who,

is correct. 3 THE COURT: All address -- I assume 4 all of this, to and from work and any other 5 approved activities restricts him to Palm 6 Beach County, is that correct? 7 PROBATION OFFICER: That is correct, 8 Your Honor. 9 THE COURT: II let's be clear, 10 everything, from the day he walks ou

l would like to refer to the non-prosecution agreement in a parallel civil suit that is pending before this court. See Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No.: 08-CIV- 80893-MARILWOFINSON. To €acilitate all these discussions, the non-prosecution agreement 5 EFTA0023

ed/Not Required Required/Requested ADJUDICATION: Adjudicate Di 1 SENTENCE: On OBCF009454AMB, the Defendant Is sentenced to 12 months in the Pain Beach County Detention Facility, with credit for 1 (one) day tine served _ 1,11470% Jos.t. biAlioAfft On 08CF009381AMB, the Defendant S sentenced to 8 months&

1 F. Supp. 1299 (M.D. Fla. 1977) 23, 24 Lockhead Martin Corp. I. Boeing Co., 393 F. Supp. 2d 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2005) 23 Oregonian Publishing Co.'. United States District Court, 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990) 9 U.S. I Rosen, 471 F. Supp. 2d 651 (E.D. Va. 2007) 23 United States'. Kooistra, 796 F.3d 1390 (11th Cir. 1986)

P-013483 EFTA00230388 (208) On or about January 1, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and raveled from Anguilla, British West Indies tc) Isa,lm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. (209) On or about January 6, 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN traveled from Tet

if any of the victims identified in the federal investigation file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and the subject matter. Epstein will not contest that the identified victims are persons who,

0166 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 2 CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119 3 4 JANE DOE NO. 2, 5 6 -vs- VOLUME II OF II 7 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 8 Defendant. 9 1

were going to take away your 24 parental rights if you didn't sign them off? 25 A. No. 0247 1 Q. And was that action brought here in Palm 2 Beach County? 3 A. Yes. 4 Q. And isn't it true that you, that DCF told 5 you you had no choice but to either voluntarily sign 6 over your rights, or they