Epstein Secrets

ul Sexual Activity with a Minor (d) counts Principal in the 1" Lewd and Lascivious Molestation (1) count From March 15, 2005, through February 2006 the Palm Reach Police Department conducted a sexual battery investigation involving Jeffrey Epstein, =I= and Sworn taped statements were taken from five victims and seventeen wit

accompany us back to the police station for further questioning. She was also to at at the conclusion of the interview she would be returned home. Beach Police Department. voluntarily came with us back to the Palm Upon our arrival at the police station, was brought to the interview room in the Detective Bureau wher

. Yours truly, Deborah L. Morse Attorney EFTA00232562 New York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010 'et' Vark tyrant arrurt APPELLATE DIVISION—FIRST DEPARTMENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. APPENDIX CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. NEW YORK COUNTY D

had handled the case, and there is no indication that she had spoken to any of the detectives who had dealt with the victims so extensively during the Palm Beach Police Department's year-long investigation of these events. Instead, as the court pointed out, the prosecutor had relied on mere "hearsay" for the notion that the vic

§ 169-8(3) 36 Fla. Stat 796.03 1 EFTA00602340 Ha. Stat. 796.07 1 EFTA00602341 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, -against- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT INTRODUCTION Defendant,

had handled the case, and there is no indication that she had spoken to any of the detectives who had dealt with the victims so extensively during the Palm Beach Police Department's year-long investigation of these events. Instead, as the court pointed out, the prosecutor had relied on mere "hearsay" for the notion that the vic

§ 169-8(3) 36 Fla. Stat 796.03 1 EFTA00792502 Ha. Stat. 796.07 1 EFTA00792503 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, -against- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT INTRODUCTION Defendant,

had handled the case, and there is no indication that she had spoken to any of the detectives who bad dealt with the victims so extensively during the Palm Beach Police Department's year-long investigation of these events. Instead, as the court pointed out, the prosecutor had relied on mere "hearsay" for the notion that the vic

w § 169-8(3) 36 Fla. Stat 796.03 1 EFTA00181149 Fla. Stat 796.07 1 EFTA00181150 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, -against- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT INTRODUCTION Defendant,