Epstein Secrets

quire your disqualification from the prosecution of these cases. (Emphasis supplied) 14. Chief Reiter’s letter to State Attorney Krischer enclosed the Town of Palm Beach Police Department’s probable cause affidavits charging Epstein and two of his assistants with multiple counts of unlawful sex acts with a minor and one count of sexual

ey Richard Tendler said. "It's a way for the prosecutor's office to not take the full responsibility for not filing the (charge), and not doing what the Palm Beach Police Department wanted. I think something fell apart with those underage witnesses." https://www.palmbeachdailynews.com/article/20060729/NEWS/190917573 3/4 NOT

andling of the 2006 charges and the civil suits that followed. 37. In a July 8, 2019, letter to the federal district court by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Epstein was described as “a serial sexual predator who preyed on dozens of minor girls over a period of years.” The letter emphasized that “the Gov

_paid to have underage girls and young women brought to. his home,where heteceived. :massages and sometimes sex, according to .ari investigation by tlie Palm Beach Police Department. Palm Beach polite spent months sifting· through· Epsteiifs trash and watching .his. Waterfront home, and Palm Beath. International Airport to keep

andling of the 2006 charges and the civil suits that followed. 40. In a July 8, 2019, letter to the federal district court by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Epstein was described as "a serial sexual predator who preyed on dozens of minor girls over a period of years." The letter emphasized that "the Gov

that the crime be Iserved as U. S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida em an interstate nexus. Secoi e . : |

nd enclosed the probable c; resulting from the Patm Beach Police Depa Kellen and Haley Rooson The submissio Assistant State Atloney Lanna @gioniaved Beach Police Department's presentation fc know that you agree that it is our public interest by discharging our ohio Drier observation to you that | continue to fin unusua

fteenth Judicial Circuit 401 North Dine Highway West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Oear Mr. Krischer, Please find enclosed the probable c; resulting from the Patm Beach Police Depa Kellen and Haley Rooson The submissio Assistant State Atloney Lanna @gioniaved Beach Police Department's presentation fc know that you agree that it

and Haley a ae Department's investigation ct later: een oe = Assistant State Altorngy Lanna vatican of these documents are both in wane A Hohiewek’s = Beach Police Department's presentation nol oe them and fo serve as the Palm ! know that you agree that i y at it's Our Shared re plese “ if esponsibility to seek | cfc lm ch

esented the case to the U.S. Attomey’s Office for the Southern District of Florida. In 2007, the Office contacted counsel

rights even before prosecutors filed a superseding indictment covering the specific crimes affecting the victims. Citing Dean, the District Court for the Eastern District of New York agreed that the rights were expansive and could apply before charges were filed but were subject to the outer limit that the Government has at least

rcement. During that period of time, the victims would not have had rights under the CVRA. In 2006, Epstein’s acts of abuse came to the attention of the Palm Beach Police Department, which began investigating the case.'°° At this point, once again, the victims would not have had rights under the proposed CVRA test. The CVRA exten

a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, an alleged victim said that Epstein,

, Rodriguez took away some notes and emails about massage appointments as “protection” against his own prosecution, and failed to produce them during the Palm Beach Police Department’s initial investigation. e javascript: ;javascript:; e http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs- and-stories/2010-07-22/jeffrey-epstein-pedophile-billionai

he NPA was signed or by misleading victims regarding the status of the federal investigation after the signing. I. OVERVIEW OF FACTUAL BACKGROUND The Palm Beach (Florida) Police Department (PBPD) began investigating Jeffrey Epstein in 2005, after the parents of a 14-year-old girl complained that Epstein had paid her for a massage. Eps

oners, and opposed by the government, was rescission of the NPA and federal prosecution of Epstein. On July 2, 2019, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York obtained a federal grand jury indictment charging Epstein with one count of sex trafficking of minors and one count of conspiracy to commit sex tra

, and trade secrets). Ms. Maxwell is aware, based on publicly reported statements by Plaintiff, Plaintiff's counsel, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and the Attorney General for the U.S. Virgin Islands, that investigations surrounding the alleged conduct of Mr. Epstein survive his death. It is

to the discovery dispute. During the course of this litigation Plaintiff offered, on more than one occasion, various iterations and compilations of the Palm Beach Police Reports in which no one identified Ms. Maxwell as a suspect, a perpetrator, or participant. The attachment of alleged summaries of flight logs, alleged fli

he NPA was signed or by misleading victims regarding the status of the federal investigation after the signing. I. OVERVIEW OF FACTUAL BACKGROUND The Palm Beach (Florida) Police Department (PBPD) began investigating Jeffrey Epstein in 2005, after the parents of a 14-year-old girl complained that Epstein had paid her for a massage. Eps

oners, and opposed by the government, was rescission of the NPA and federal prosecution of Epstein. On July 2, 2019, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York obtained a federal grand jury indictment charging Epstein with one count of sex trafficking of minors and one count of conspiracy to commit sex tra