Epstein Secrets

was' I) A. : can't remember. It O. Okay. All right. You spoke with police u office.. In connection with that though, correct? 16 I went to the Pain Peach Police Department. I? Why did you go to the -- It I speak to one officer. 19 Q. and why did you go there? 20 A. Ilecauae Kr. -- when I spoke to Mr. Epstein en

•COuniniscant Pp. 116 1 2 O. That never happened? 3 A. Never happened. 4 O. You mentioned that Mr. Epstein put you in 5 contact with Mr. Murrell, 18 that Correct? MR. °UPTON: Fag. 7 THE 14119690: Hot Hr. Crinkle.. • BY MR. METMELSICINt • O. Huh? 10 A. It wasn't Mr. Epstein. 11 O.

ODUCT Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011803 EFTA00192849 DIRE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEBS IS.QPPIROSECITTIOLLAGEEEMENT IT APPEARING that the City of Palm Beach Police Department and the Slate Attorney's Office for the ISth Judicial Circuit in and foe Palm Beach County Oureinafter, the "Sum Attorney'. Office, have conducted

facility (the mail, phone, or intemet)—not thereafter—and the scienter element must be present while the facility is being used. See United States'. Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283, 1286 (11th Cir. 2004) ("[T]he government must first prove that [Defendant], using the Internet, acted with a specific intent to per

at have been presentlxl to you have been materially inaccurate. As you may know. the principal witnesses in this case were lirst interviewed by of the Palm Reach Police Department (the "PRP1)") and other slate law enforcement officers. These interviews (the "witness statements") were ollen tape-recorded thus providing a verba

e.g. with himself or a third party), without then actually committing any sex act himself, he would nevertheless violate §2422(b)." United States v. Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283, 1286 (11th Cu. 2004). See also United States v. Bailey 228 F.3d 637, 639 (61° Cir. 2000) ("Congress has made a clear choice to crimi

s meeting. The events at issue occurred in 2004 and 2005. The matter was investigated during the course of nearly a year beginning in March 2005 by the Palm Beach County Police Department (PBPD). As will be discussed in detail below, it appears that a PBPD detective formed a view early on as to the criminality of the conduct of Jeff

61 (11th Cir. 1949); United States Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 05); United States I Root, 296 F.3d 1222 (11'h Cir. 200 ). United States I Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2004), is in the same mold, except that, in that tiling operation, the defendant communicated, not with the purported 13 y

ae87de EFTA00181638 Page 90 1 started, I got home and I had a card, a business card 2 from a police officer. I think it was Paul from the 3 Palm Beach Department. 4 And -- and I got scared. And I was trying to 5 find out what it's all about. Because it was an 6 occasion with Mr. Epstein that we had a dis

7 get a lawyer, that's fine. 8 And that's where I got Mr lancl 'ust 9 came to us, to sign this, to -- that was d of it. 10 Q. Who got Mr. Murrell for you? 11 A. Who got it? Mr. Epstein.  12 Q. When you met with this investigator at 13 Carabbas, 14 A. Yes. 15 Q. -- did he record

at was important for us. 19 don't want to be involved with this thing. I'm out of 20 the job three years ago, and that's why we hired 21 Mr. Murrell. He suggested that. 22 Q. Did he ask you if anybody else has been 23 contacted? 24 A. No. 25 Q. Did he tell you that to call him ba

tion of any recommended treatment and the evaluator must be approved by the Department of Corrections; full payment of the costs of investigation by the Palm Beach Police Department; and may apply for early termination of probation after 3 years if there are no violations and all conditions have been successfully completed. This