Epstein Secrets

8 Al EKO, CLERK. 3/27/2023 4:10:49 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY Filing# 125411406 E-Filed 04/22/2021 11:42:00 AM CA FLORIO A HOLDINGS, LLC, Publisher of THE PALM ]JliACH POST, Plaintiff, V. DA VE ARONBERG, as State Attorney of Palm Beach County, Florida; SHARON R. BOCK, as Clerk and Comptroller of Palin Beach County,

00 ■ Fax 954. 765.1477 ■ ,wwv,.gtlaw.com 16 ACTIVE 53842Q30v7 CA/ArOfti~~P~Al~ BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3r27/2023 4:10:49 PM D. The Palm Beach Post’s Extensive 15-Year Reporting On Epstein’s Crimes. 61. Plaintiff, The Palm Beach Post, is a community newspaper serving readers in Palm Beach County an

y constitutional free speech principles, as a testifying grand jury witness is free to disclose her grand jury testimony . In I Butterworth v. Smith, the United States Supreme Court, weighing the competing interests of grand jury secrecy and the First Amendment, held unconstitutional Section 905;.27’s prohibition on a witness rev

The court has already entered an order dated June 25, 2009 on: a) Non-party, M.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and petition for Access c) Motions to Intervene and for an order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Court

3). Also on June 11, non-party ■. filed motions to intervene and for an order unsealing the records, alleging grounds similar to non-parties . and The Palm Beach Post (A-12). Judge Colbath heard .'s, The Post's, and ■.'s motions to unseal and Mr. Epstein's motion for confidentiality on June 25, 2009 (A-16). The

eeding which itself is protected by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g, Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court

t. The court has already entered an order dated June 25, 2009 on: a) Non-party,E's Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and petition for Access c) Motions to Intervene and for an order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make Court

3). Also on June 11, non-party ■. filed motions to intervene and for an order unsealing the records, alleging grounds similar to non-parties . and The Palm Beach Post (A-12). Judge Colbath heard M.'s, The Post's, and M's motions to unseal and Mr. Epstein's motion for confidentiality on June 25, 2009 (A-16). The c

eeding which itself is protected by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See a Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can

fs' allegations are without any factual basis and know such assertions to be false and untrue. 3. Defendant agrees with Plaintiff's assertion that the Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD) executed a search warrant at EPSTEIN's Palm Beach mansion on October 25, 2005. See '1!4 Plaintiffs' motion. 4. Defendant's atto

in the development of other incriminating evidence that can be used at trial. Id; Pillsbury Company v. Conboy, 495 U.S. 248, 103 S.Ct. 608 (1983). The United States Supreme Court has made clear that the scope of the Fifth Amendment Privilege includes the circumstances as here "the act of producing documents in response to a

questioning so savage that it made local headlines. See Jane Musgrave, Victims Seeking Sex offender's Millions See Painful Pasts Used Against Them, Palm Beach Post News, Jan. 23, 2010, available at http://www.nalmbeachnost.com/news/crimeivictims- seekina-sex-offenders-millions-see-nainful-nasts-192988.html attached h

sponsibilities, PAUL G. CASSELL clerked first for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (1984-1985) and then from 1985 to 1986 clerked for the United States Supreme Court before serving as an Associate Deputy Attorney EFTA00188845 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM L,,,,ument 291-10 Entered on FLSD 01/21/2015 Page 3 of 7 Edwa

he court has already entered an order dated June 25, 2009 on: a) Non-party, E.W.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unseal Records b) Palm Beach Post's Motions to Intervene and petition for Access c) B.B's Motions to Intervene and for an order to Unseal Records d) Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Make

eeding which itself is protected by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court