Epstein Secrets

d infra, Mr. Edwards has certain info1mation from the Palm Beach Police Department, which resulted from various alleged

, the Mermelstein and Horowitz firm was quoted in the Palm Beach Post stating, among other things, that the book sold t

ny, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment'

fs' allegations are without any factual basis and know such assertions to be false and untrue. 3. Defendant agrees with Plaintiff's assertion that the Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD) executed a search warrant at EPSTEIN's Palm Beach mansion on October 25, 2005. See '1!4 Plaintiffs' motion. 4. Defendant's atto

tates, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, §138 (6 th Ed.). See also Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth A

rmation from both the Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorneys' file. In fact, as argued infra, Mr. Edwards has certain information from the Palm Beach Police Department, which resulted from various alleged "trash pulls" from a residence on Palm Beach (e.g., certain notepads). Finally, at the deposition

bor of the 5 Amendment.2 See Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17(1991). 2 See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company. 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth

stipulation, Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00793892 2 3 4 5 6 7 49 just for record, the case I keep on my bunch is Palm Beach Polo holdings, Inc., et. al versus Broward Marino, Inc. I have the original email from the Fourth District Court of Appeal copy. So I don't have a cit

66:20 held 74:5 84:10 high 17:3 highlight 82:18 highlighted 8:12 30:5 68:6,7 highlights 78:1 highly 17:7,9 Highway 1:15 history 66:22 80:24 Hogan 70:5 holding 69:24 holdings 8:4 49:2 69:25 Honor 4:8,12,16 5:5 5:22 8:5 9:10 10:6 11:19 12:23 14:3 14:12 15:14 16:20 19:8 20:6 21:20 22:11,2

UIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CRIMINAL DIVISION STATE OF FLORIDA vs. Case Nos.: 2006-CF9454-AXX & 2008-9381U-AND( JEFFREY EPSTEIN PALM BEACH POST'S MOTION TO INTERVENE AND PETITION FOR ACCESS Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc., d/b/a The Palm Beach Post (the "Post") moves to Intervene in this action

asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 41" DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth