4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
atute covers interstate transportation of woman without pecuniary motive where intent is to have illicit relations with her by force or otherwise); Brown v United States, 237 F.2d 281 (8'h Cir. 1956) (the defendant violated the Act when he tricked woman into his car and drove her across state lines w
stretch the statute beyond what all understand is its modem day intended purpose. 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) — The Misconduct Alleged Does Not Fall Within the Ambit of the Statute In enacting the internet trolling statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), Congressional concerns were focused on a very specific and recent phenomenon: young
atute covers interstate transportation of woman without pecuniary motive where intent is to have illicit relations with her by force or otherwise); Brown 'United States, 237 F.2d 281 (8th Cir. 1956) (the defendant violated the Act when he tricked woman into his car and drove her across state lines wh
tretch the statute beyond what all understand is its modern day intended purpose. 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) — The Misconduct Alleged Does Not Fall Within the Ambit of the Statute In enacting thentemebrolling statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), Congressional concerns were focused on a very specific and recent phenomenon: young peop
atute covers interstate transportation of woman without pecuniary motive where intent is to have illicit relations with her by force or otherwise); Brown v United States, 237 F.2d 281 (8th Cir. 1956) (the defendant violated the Act when he tricked woman into his car and drove her across state lines w
tretch the statute beyond what all understand is its modern day intended purpose. 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) — The Misconduct Alleged Does Not Fall Within the Ambit of the Statute In enacting th(internerolling statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), Congressional concerns were focused on a very specific and recent phenomenon: young peo
atute covers interstate transportation of woman without pecuniary motive where intent is to have illicit relations with her by force or otherwise); Brown v United States, 237 F.2d 281 (8th Cir. 1956) (the defendant violated the Act when he tricked woman into his car and drove her across state lines w
tretch the statute beyond what all understand is its modern day intended purpose. 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) — The Misconduct Alleged Does Not Fall Within the Ambit of the Statute In enacting th(mtemebrolling statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), Congressional concerns were focused on a very specific and recent phenomenon: young peop
Entities connected to both Julie K. Brown and the Ambit of the Statute

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSONEmmy Taylor
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSONSouthern District
LOCATION
Jennifer Lopez
PERSON
Cleveland
LOCATION
Alberto Gonzales
PERSON
Las Vegas
LOCATION
New York State
LOCATION
Hunter Biden
PERSONRoy Black
PERSON
Palm Beach Police Department
ORGANIZATIONEvans
PERSONJoe Recarey
PERSON