3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
-Specific Remedies When I was growing in the pre-Brown versus Board of Education era of legally mandated
h Court dismissed the case as moot, thus postponing the decision as to whether it would uphold race-specific affirmative action programs. But Justice William O. Douglas, probably the 57 DeFunis v. Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312 (1974). 291 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017378 4.2.12 WC: 191694 court’s most liberal member at the time,
sh holidays. It was across the road from The Posh Brown’s, made famous by Jerry Lewis, who frequently per
never I visited—then as a full participant). The first time I went to Kronheim’s for lunch, we picked up two justices at the Supreme Court building: William O. Douglas and William Brennan. I had previously met Justice Brennan through his son Bill, who was my law school classmate and moot court partner. Justice Brenn
must not be overinclusive or underinclusive. See Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn.: “Underinclusive
rari in Rudolph v. Alabama (1963)—a case involving imposition of the death penalty on a black man who was convicted of raping a white woman. Justice William O. Douglas signed on as well. The dissenters invited the bar to address the following questions, which they deemed “relevant and worthy of argument and consider
Entities connected to both Julie K. Brown and William O. Douglas

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Stephen Hawking
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSON
Woody Allen
PERSON
John F. Kennedy
PERSON
Hillary Clinton
PERSON
Michael Cohen
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Barry Diller
PERSON
Abraham Lincoln
PERSON
Michael Douglas
PERSON
Vicky Ward
PERSON