Epstein Secrets

appointed. See Roski v. Roski, 730 I.2d at 413; Black's Law Dic- tionary 70 (6th ed.1990). Section 61.4

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian, Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did

appointed. See Roski v. Roski, 730 So.2d at 413; Black's Law Dic- tionary 70 (6th ed.1990). Section 61.4

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian. Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did

appointed. See Roski v. Rosh!, 730 So.2d at 413; Black's Law Dic- tionary 70 (6th ed.1990). Section 61.4

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian, Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did