Epstein Secrets

ise for gain, benefit, advantage or livelihood" (Black's Law Dictionary (7th ed. 2007)) or as "a usually

that when asked by Mr. Epstein, the girls affirmatively misrepresented their ages as bein 18, and/or Mr. Epstein was not aware of thcir true ages. (Gonzales Statement at 39, Statement at 12, Pentek Statement at 5, Statement at 9). Indeed, although he noted that Gonzales had told Mr. Epstein she was 18, omitted f

ise for gain, benefit, advantage or livelihood" (Black's Law Dictionary (7th ed. 2007)) or as "a usually

that when asked by Mr. Epstein, the girls affirmatively misrepresented their ages as being 18, and/or Mr. Epstein was not aware of their true ages. (Gonzales Statement at 39, Robson Statement at 12, Pentek Statement at 5, Laduke Statement at 9). Indeed, although he noted that Gonzales had told Mr. Epstein she was

ack, Esq. Black Srebnick 1Cornspan & Stumpf PA 201 S. Biscayne Blvd, Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 Re: Correspondence Dated July 13, 2007 Dear Mr. Black: Thank you for your letter ofJuly 13, 2007. You and your firm are neither a subpoenaedparty nor counsel to a subpoenaed parry. Accordingly, pursuan

g that when asked by Mr. Epstein, the girls affirmatively misrepresented their ages as bein 18, and/or Mr. Ein i was not aware of their true ages. (Gonzales Statement at 39, Statement at 12, Statement at 5, Statement at 9). Indeed, although he noted that Gonzales had told Mr. Epstein she was 18, omitted from th