Epstein Secrets

ll the arguments advanced by proposed intervenors Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz in their motion to inte

ivilege has been extended to numerous areas: to a defense contractor's confidential assessment of its equal loyment ir. tunity practices, Banks v. Lockheed-Georgia Co., 53 . 283 .1971); to accounting records, New York Stock Exchange v. Sloan, 22 Fed.R.Serv.2d (Callaghan) 500 ( .1980); to securities law, In re C

l the arguments advanced by proposed intervenors Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz in their motion to inte

ege has been extended to numerous areas: to a defense contractor's confidential assessment of its equal employment opportunity practices, Banks v. Lockheed-Georgia Co., 53 F.R.D. 283 (N.D.Ga.1971); to accounting records, New York Stock Exchange v. Sloan, 22 Fed.R.Serv.2d (Callaghan) 500 (S.D.N.Y.1980); to securi

l the arguments advanced by proposed intervenors Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz in their motion to inter

ivilege has been extended to numerous areas: to a defense contractor's confidential assessment of its equal loyment ir. tunity practices, Banks v. Lockheed-Georgia Co., 53 . 283 .1971); to accounting records, New York Stock Exchange v. Sloan, 22 Fed.R.Serv.2d (Callaghan) 500 ( .1980); to securities law, In re C