Epstein Secrets

endant. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING OF INTERVENORS ROY BLACK, MARTIN WEINBERG, AND JAY LEFKOWITZ IN SUPPORT O

mpromised by any disclosure, regardless of whether the communications are later excluded as evidence in proceedings in this case. The plaintiffs in Bottaro sued a number of defendants for securities fraud. One defendant 5 EFTA00205564 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2

ll the arguments advanced by proposed intervenors Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz in their motion to inte

inadmissibility would be compromised by any disclosure whether or not it was later excluded as evidence against the intervenor. The plaintiffs in Bottaro sued a number of defendants for securities fraud. One defendant settled and was dismissed from the lawsuit. The remaining defendants later moved to

l the arguments advanced by proposed intervenors Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz in their motion to inte

e inquiry must have some evidentiary value before an order to compel disclosure of otherwise inadmissible material will issue ). The plaintiffs in Bottaro sued a number of defendants for securities fraud. One defendant settled and was dismissed from the lawsuit. The remaining defendants later moved to

l the arguments advanced by proposed intervenors Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz in their motion to inter

he inquiry must have some evidentiary value before an order to compel disclosure of otherwise inadmissible material will issue"). The plaintiffs in Bottaro sued a number of defendants for securities fraud. One defendant settled and was dismissed from the lawsuit. The remaining defendants later moved to