Epstein Secrets

as Blvd., Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394; Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, 401 East Las Olas B

victims and the public," Berger said. "The public should be outraged it has gone as far as it has." A second attorney representing the women, Brad Edwards, has seen the sealed document A federal judge allowed him and his clients to view it, but not to discuss its con- tents. Edwards said the wom

he women, Brad Edwards, has seen the sealed document A federal judge allowed him and his clients to view it, but not to discuss its con- tents. Edwards said the women were "outraged" at what had been negotiated without their knowledge. A reporter asked Edwards if he thought Epstein re- ceived

losed, and the state is clearly subject to its provisions. E.g., Wallace I. Guzman, 687 So. 2d 1351, 1353 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (exemptions to federal Freedom of Information Act do not apply to state agencies); Hous. Auth. of the City of Daytona Beach'. Gomillion, 639 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (Federal Privacy Act

sq., Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq., Leopold-Kuvin, nd Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. and William J. Berger, Esq., Rothstein Rosenfeldt

Goldberger, et al., 2 kobert D. Critton, Esq., Burman, Critton, Luther & ColemanIMININ EM., T. Kuvin, Esq., Leopold-Kuvin, P.A., and Bradley 3. Edwards, Esq. and William J. Jane Kreusler-Walsh, ; Spencer Berger, Esq., Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, on this 20th day of July, 2009. 6 EFTA00233656

heir appearances? 4 MR. HOROWITZ: Adam Horowitz, counsel for plaintiffs 5 Jane 2 through Jane Doe 7. 6 THE COURT: Good morning. 7 MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane 8 Doe. 9 THE COURT: Good morning. 10 MR. GARCIA: Good morning, Your Honor. Sid Garcia for 11 Jane Doe II. 12 THE

closed, and the state is clearly subject to its provisions. E.g., Wallace,. Guzman, 687 So. 2d 1351, 1353 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (exemptions to federal Freedom of Information Act do not apply to state agencies); Hous. Auth. of the City of Daytona Beach'. Gomillion, 639 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (Federal Privacy Act

rd, Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410; and Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. and William J. Berger, Esq., Rothstein Rosenfeldt

00, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410; and Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. and William J. Berger, Esq., Rothstein Rose

losed, and the state is clearly subject to its provisions. E.Q., Wallace v. Guzman, 687 So. 2d 1351, 1353 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (exemptions to federal Freedom of Information Act do not apply to state agencies); Nous. Auth. of the City of Daytona Beach v Gomillion, 639 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (Federal Privacy Act

NTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Def

Lake City, Utah 84114; [email protected] to: Bradley J. Edwards, Esq, Farmer, Jaffe et al, 425 North Andrews Avenu

o file an administrative appeal, your appeal should be made in writing and received within sixty (60) days of the date of this letter, by writing to: Freedom of Information Appeal, Deputy Director, U.S. Secret Service, Communications Center, 245 Murray Lane, S8.W., Building T-5, Washington, D.C. 20223. If you choose to f