Epstein Secrets

to 29 Response in Opposition to Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit October 9, 2008 letter from Brad Edwards, Esquire to AUSA Dexter Lee, # 2 Exhibit October 15, 2008 Letter from Brad Edwards, Esquire to AUSA Dexter Lee)(Edwards, Bradley) (Entered: 10/16/20

nt to the victims included this proposed stipulation: On July 9, 2008, AUSA Villafafla sent a victim notification to Jane Doe # I via her attorney, Bradley Edwards, which is attached as Exhibit 6 to the Villafafia Declaration. That notification contains a written explanation of the full terms of the agreement

JUDGE 14 Appearances: 15 FOR THE PETITIONER Bradley J. Edwards, ESQ., and 16 Paul G. Cassell, ESQ. 1? FOR THE RESP

s based in the Lewis & Clark College of Law. During the call, Ms. Garvin was not advised about the Non-Prosecution Agreement. In mid-June 2008, Mr. Edwards contacted Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafafia to inform her that he represented Jane Doe #1 and, later, Jane Doe #2. Mr. Edwards asked to meet to pro

the improper deposition. 12. In mid-June 2008, Attorney Edwards contacted AUSA Villafafia to inform her that he

d be treated with at least the same consideration. See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8) (victim's right to "be treated with fairness"). 5. I am hoping that the Special Agents' and my client's recollections about one point of the October 26th meeting coincides: that she was never told that the agreement blocked all federal

with fairness"). In addition, your proposed stipulation states that: "On July 9, 2008, sent a victim notification to Jane Doe #1 via her attorney, Bradley Edwards. which is attached as Exhibit 6 to the Declaration. That notification contains a written explanation of the full terms of the agreement between Ep

stipulation regarding my contact with the office is somewhat abbreviated. I wonder what you would think about the following: In mid-June 2008, Mr. Edwards contacted to inform her that he represented Jane Doe #1 and, later, Jane Doe #2. Mr. Edwards asked to meet to provide information about the federa

d be treated with at least the same consideration. See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8) (victim's right to "be treated with fairness"). 5. I am hoping that the Special Agents' and my client's recollections about one point of the October 26th meeting coincides: that she was never told that the agreement blocked all federal

). In addition, your proposed stipulation states that: "On July 9, 2008, AUSA Villafafla sent a victim notification to Jane Doe #1 via her attorney, Bradley Edwards, which is attached as Exhibit 6 to the VOWS& Declaration. That notification contains a written explanation of the full terms of the agreement betwe

stipulation regarding my contact with the office is somewhat abbreviated. I wonder what you would think about the following: In mid-June 2008, Mr. Edwards contacted AUSA a to inform her that he represented Jane Doe #1 and, later, Jane Doe #2. Mr. Edwards asked to meet to provide information about the

d be treated with at least the same consideration. See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8) (victim's right to "be treated with fairness"). 5. I am hoping that the Special Agents' and my client's recollections about one point of the October 26th meeting coincides: that she was never told that the agreement blocked all federal