Epstein Secrets

ESQUIRE Burman, rr4tfnn or al. 1 1 1 1 14 15 1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2 2 On behalf of Third Party E.W. WILLIAM J. BERGER, ESQUIRE BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQUIRE Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler On behalf of Third Party, The Post DEANNA SHULLMAN, ESQUIRE Thomas, LoCiero & EFTA00233769 Proceedings Jun

Ms. Shullman, good morning. Mr. Borger, gOOd morning. And Hr. Berger, your client is E -- HR. BERGER: E.W., yes. THE COURT: Anybody else here? MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edward■ on behalf of E.N. as well, Judge. Thanks. EFTA00233748 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2

man, good morning. Mr. Borger, gOOd morning. And Hr. Berger, your client is E -- HR. BERGER: E.W., yes. THE COURT: Anybody else here? MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edward■ on behalf of E.N. as well, Judge. Thanks. EFTA00233748 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

fense was confirmed when she was interviewed by 'Attorney Edwards filed his Motion on behalf of "Jane Doe," without

re public events, re- cords of court proceedings are public records, and there is a strong presumption in favor of public ac- cess to such matters." Sentinel Communications Co. I Watson, 615 So.2d 768, 770 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (citing Barron I Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc., 531 So.2d 113 (Fla.1988)). This presumption r

, State Attorney's Office- West Palm Beach, 401 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, William J Berger, Esq., ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, 4 Shullman, Robert D. Critton, BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER, & COLEMAN, . this 11 day of June, 2009. Deanna K. B

e women, Brad Edwards, has seen the sealed document. A federal judge allowed him and his clients to view it, but not to discuss its con- tents. Edwards said the women were "outraged" at what had been negotiated without their knowledge. A reporter asked Edwards if he thought Epstein re- ceived

iam J Berger, Esq., ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, 4 Shullman, Rober

of the New York Times Co.'. Holtzendorf, 507 So. 2d 667(Fla. 2d DCA 1987) 9 Sarasota-Herald Tribune I State, 924 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) 2 Sentinel Communications Co. I Watson, 615 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) 9 Wallace I. Guzman, 687 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) 21 ii EFTA00233611 Other Authorities F

digging up new details about Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew." Two days later, on March 13, 2011, "The Observer" reported (copy attached): "Edwards' lawyer, Jack Scarola, said last week that his team intended to try and get a statement from the prince [Andrew] about what he may or may not . hav

commentary in this matter which either: (1) concerns Mr. Epstein's alleged sexual abuse of or being with minor females; or, (2) is injurious to Mr. Bradley Edwards' reputation, consistent with 4.3-6 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. We trust that you will agree to a swift and amicable resolution of this

in Epstein v. Edwards. In Florida, a court may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348 (1966); Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson, 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by the court on communications between the media and lawyers and/or lit

rd, Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410; and Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. and William J. Berger, Esq., Rothstein Rosenfeldt

00, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410; and Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. and William J. Berger, Esq., Rothstein Rose

tration 2.420 954 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 2007) 507 So. 2d 667(Fla. 2d DCA 1987) 9 Sarasota-Herald Tribune v. State, 924 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) 2 Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson 615 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) 9 Wallacos—augman, 687 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) 21 ii 09/12/2019 Page 3189 Agency to Agen

Critton, et al. 515 N. Flagler Drive, Ste. 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-4349 On behalf of Third Partylill. WILLIAM J. BERGER, 1 1 1 ESQUIRE BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQUIRE Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 1 401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 14 15 1 On behalf of Third Party, The Post

Me. Shullman, good morning. Hr. Berger, good morning. And Mr. Borger, your client is E -- NR. BERGER: ., yes. THE COURT: Anybody else here? Nit. EDWARDS: Bred Edwards on behalf of as well, Judge. Thanks, EFTA00183597 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

re public events, re- cords of court proceedings are public records, and there is a strong presumption in favor of public ac- cess to such matters." Sentinel Communications Co. I. Watson, 615 So.2d 768, 770 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (citing Barron'. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Mc., 531 So.2d 113 (Fla.1988)). This presumption r

Palm Beach EFTA00616232 Jack Scarola, Esq. March 15, 2011 Page 2 On March 13, 2011, two days later, "The Observer" reported (copy attached): "Edwards' lawyer, Jack Scarola, said last week that his team intended to try and get a statement from the prince [Andrew] about what he may or may not have

in Epstein v. Edwards. In Florida, a court may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348 (1966); Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by the court on communications between the media and lawyers and/or liti