Epstein Secrets

to the limited extent that the events described concerned April 2007. Several months later, Jane Doe 2 obtained new counsel not paid for by Epstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and circumstances changed. See Edwards Decl., DE 225-1 at 17; Edwards Affidavit of Aug. 11, 2017 at 1 11, 1 16; Jane Doe 2 Decl., 361-27 at 1-2. 1

osecution — which Jane Doe 1 has specifically disputed by her affidavit. See Jane Doe 1 Decl., DE 361-26; see also Edwards Decl., DE 225-1 at 17-18; Edwards Affidavit of Aug. II, 2017 at 11 11-25; Victims S.J. Mot., DE 361 at1 71 & n.85;172 & n.86; 173 & n.87; 1 74 & n.88; 1 75 & n.89; 1 76 & n.90; 1 77

respect 12 EFTA00799885 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 415 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2017 Page 13 of 14 to what AUSA Villafana told attorney Brad Edwards. See generally Edwards Affidavit of Aug. 11, 2017, particularly at 911 11-25. Edwards Decl. (filed contemporaneously with this response). DATED: Au

08-cv-80736-KAM Document 415 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2017 Page 4 of 14 For example, Bradley J. Edwards represented Jane Doe 2 in July 2008. See Edwards Decl., DE 225-1 at 17; Edwards Affidavit of Aug. 11, 2017 at 1 11,1 16; Jane Doe 2 Decl., 361-27 at 1-2. 14. Admitted to the extent that the events desc

9.) The May 30, 2008 victim letter to Jane Doe 5 also acknowledged the victims' rights under the CVRA . (DE 407 at ¶ 100.) In mid-June of 2008, Mr. Bradley Edwards, the attorney for Petitioners, contacted the line prosecutor to inform her that he represented Jane Doe 1 and, later, Jane Doe 2. Edwards asked to

r. Bradley Edwards, the attorney for Petitioners, contacted the line prosecutor to inform her that he represented Jane Doe 1 and, later, Jane Doe 2. Edwards asked to meet to provide information about the federal crimes committed by Epstein against these victims. The line prosecutor and Edwards discussed

l investigation or that the state plea would resolve the federal crimes. Edwards claims he was not told his clients could address the state court. (Edwards Decl. If 117-18, DE 416-1.) In contrast, the line prosecutor claims she told Edwards that his clients could address the state court. Decl. ¶ 38, DE 403-

9.) The May 30, 2008 victim letter to Jane Doe 5 also acknowledged the victims' rights under the CVRA . (DE 407 at ¶ 100.) In mid-June of 2008, Mr. Bradley Edwards, the attorney for Petitioners, contacted the line prosecutor to inform her that he represented Jane Doe 1 and, later, Jane Doe 2. Edwards asked to

r. Bradley Edwards, the attorney for Petitioners, contacted the line prosecutor to inform her that he represented Jane Doe 1 and, later, Jane Doe 2. Edwards asked to meet to provide information about the federal crimes committed by Epstein against these victims. The line prosecutor and Edwards discussed

l investigation or that the state plea would resolve the federal crimes. Edwards claims he was not told his clients could address the state court. (Edwards Decl. ¶¶17-18, DE 416-1.) In contrast, the line prosecutor claims she told Edwards that his clients could address the state court. (Villafaiia Decl. ¶ 38

9.) The May 30, 2008 victim letter to Jane Doe 5 also acknowledged the victims' rights under the CVRA . (DE 407 at ¶ 100.) In mid-June of 2008, Mr. Bradley Edwards, the attorney for Petitioners, contacted the line prosecutor to inform her that he represented Jane Doe 1 and, later, Jane Doe 2. Edwards asked to

r. Bradley Edwards, the attorney for Petitioners, contacted the line prosecutor to inform her that he represented Jane Doe 1 and, later, Jane Doe 2. Edwards asked to meet to provide information about the federal crimes committed by Epstein against these victims. The line prosecutor and Edwards discussed

l investigation or that the state plea would resolve the federal crimes. Edwards claims he was not told his clients could address the state court. (Edwards Decl. ¶¶17-18, DE 416-1.) In contrast, the line prosecutor claims she told Edwards that his clients could address the state court. (Villafaiia Decl. ¶ 38

9.) The May 30, 2008 victim letter to Jane Doe 5 also acknowledged the victims' rights under the CVRA . (DE 407 at ¶ 100.) In mid-June of 2008, Mr. Bradley Edwards, the attorney for Petitioners, contacted the line prosecutor to inform her that he represented Jane Doe 1 and, later, Jane Doe 2. Edwards asked to

r. Bradley Edwards, the attorney for Petitioners, contacted the line prosecutor to inform her that he represented Jane Doe 1 and, later, Jane Doe 2. Edwards asked to meet to provide information about the federal crimes committed by Epstein against these victims. The line prosecutor and Edwards discussed

l investigation or that the state plea would resolve the federal crimes. Edwards claims he was not told his clients could address the state court. (Edwards Decl. ¶¶17-18, DE 416-1.) In contrast, the line prosecutor claims she told Edwards that his clients could address the state court. (' Decl. ¶ 38, DE 403

9.) The May 30, 2008 victim letter to Jane Doe 5 also acknowledged the victims' rights under the CVRA . (DE 407 at ¶ 100.) In mid-June of 2008, Mr. Bradley Edwards, the attorney for Petitioners, contacted the line prosecutor to inform her that he represented Jane Doe 1 and, later, Jane Doe 2. Edwards asked to

r. Bradley Edwards, the attorney for Petitioners, contacted the line prosecutor to inform her that he represented Jane Doe 1 and, later, Jane Doe 2. Edwards asked to meet to provide information about the federal crimes committed by Epstein against these victims. The line prosecutor and Edwards discussed

l investigation or that the state plea would resolve the federal crimes. Edwards claims he was not told his clients could address the state court. (Edwards Decl. ¶¶17-18, DE 416-1.) In contrast, the line prosecutor claims she told Edwards that his clients could address the state cou ecl. ¶ 38, DE 403-19.)