Epstein Secrets

that, should CEOS reject Epstein's objections to the agreement, then U.S. Attorneys Correspondence at 290-91. 39. On May 30, 2008, another of Mr. Edwards's clients who was recognized as an Epstein victim by the U.S. Attorney's Office, received a letter from the FBI advising her that "Mk case is curre

gal counsel. In May 2008, the Office sent a similar letter stating "your case is currently investigation" to another victim (represented by attorney Bradley J. Edwards). As late as the middle of June 2008 — more than eight months after the non-prosecution agreement had been signed — the Assistant U.S. Attorney han

l had provided. The U.S. Attorney's Office called attorney Edwards to provide notice to his clients regarding the h

sonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. I1(b). Rule 1 1 uses an objective standard. Kaplan v. DaimlerChrysler, A.G., 331 F.3d I251, 1255 (11th ar. 2003). The analysis is whether "a reasonable attorney in like circumstances could believe that his actions were factu

that, should CEOS reject Epstein's objections to the agreement, then U.S. Attorneys Correspondence at 290-91. 39. On May 30, 2008, another of Mr. Edwards's clients who was recognized as an Epstein victim by the U.S. Attorney's Office, received a letter from the FBI advising her that "Mk case is curre

gal counsel. In May 2008, the Office sent a similar letter stating "your case is currently investigation" to another victim (represented by attorney Bradley J. Edwards). As late as the middle of June 2008 — more than eight months after the non-prosecution agreement had been signed — the Assistant U.S. Attorney han

l had provided. The U.S. Attorney's Office called attorney Edwards to provide notice to his clients regarding the h

reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b). Rule 11 uses an objective standard. Kaplan'. Daimleravysler, A.G., 331 F.3d I251, 1255 (11th ar. 2003). The analysis is whether "a reasonable attorney in like circumstances could believe that his actions were factu

counsel for the United States. Assistant United States Attorney Dexter Lee reported that the United States does not oppose the Motion to Intervene. Bradley Edwards, Esq., counsel for Plaintiffs reported that they oppose the Motion to Intervene. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Bruce E. Reinhart BRUCE E. REINHART,

any of Epstein's attorneys. 18. Prior to the filing of Plaintiff's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act, neither Mr. Edwards, nor Judge Ca.qgell, nor anyone on their behalf contacted me to determine if the allegations in Paragraphs 52 and 53 of that Motion were true. I d

asonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b). Rule 11 uses an objective standard. Kaplan v. DaimlerChrysler, A.G., 331 F.3d 1251, 1255 (11th Cir. 2003). The analysis is whether "a reasonable attorney in like circumstances could believe that his actions were fact

3, 2010 U.S. Legal Support (561) 835-0220 EFTA00181769 2 1 2 3 4 6 7 April 13,2010 INDEX WITNESS DIRECT CROSS REDIRECT RECROSS BY MR. EDWARDS 5 98 BY MR. HOROWITZ 65 BY MR. LANGINO 77 BY MS. EZELL 8I 10 EXHIBITS 11 PLAINTIFF'S FOR IDENTIFICATION 12 I Message dated August 21,

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 in either 2001 or 2002? MR. YAREMA: Object to the form. A Fifth. Q Did you, in fact, call A.G. to come to Jeffrey Epstein's home and give him a massage in a sexual nature in 2001 or 2002? MR. YAREMA: Object to the form. A Fifth. Q Dld you

for a massage of a sexual nature? MR. YAREMA: Object to the Iona. A Fifth. Q Did Jeffrey Epstein tell you it was his intent during the course of A.G.'s visit to his home to persuade, induce or entice her to engage in sexual activity? MR. YAREMA: Object to the form. A Fifth. Q Didn't Jeffrey Ep

any of Epstein's attorneys. 18. Prior to the filing of Plaintiff's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act, neither Mr. Edwards, nor Judge Cassell, nor anyone on their behalf contacted me to determine if the allegations in Paragraphs 52 and 53 of that Motion were true. I de

counsel for the United States. Assistant United States Attorney Dexter Lee reported that the United States does not oppose the Motion to Intervene. Bradley Edwards, Esq., counsel for Plaintiffs reported that they oppose the Motion to Intervene. Respectfully submitted, is/ Bruce E. Reinhart BRUCE E. REINHART,

easonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b). Rule 11 uses an objective standard. Kaplan v. Dainderarysler, A.G., 331 F.3d 1251, .1255 (11th Cir. 2003). The analysis is whether "a reasonable • attorney in like circumstances could believe that his actions were

h any of Epstein's attorneys. 18. Prior to the filing of Plaintiffs Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act, neither Mr. Edwards, nor Judge Cassell, nor anyone on their behalf contacted me to determine if the allegations in Paragraphs 52 and 53 of that Motion were true. I de

counsel for the United States. Assistant United States Attorney Dexter Lee reported that the United States does not oppose the Motion to Intervene. Bradley Edwards, Esq., counsel for Plaintiffs reported that they oppose the Motion to Intervene. Respectfully submitted, hi Bruce E. Reinhart BRUCE E. REINHART,P

asonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b). Rule 11 uses an objective standard. Kaplan ! DaintlerChrysler, A.G., 331 F.3d 1251, .1255 (11th Cir. 2003). The analysis is whether "a reasonable • attorney in like circumstances could believe that his actions were

any of Epstein's attorneys. 18. Prior to the filing of Plaintiff's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act, neither Mr. Edwards, nor Judge Ca.qgell, nor anyone on their behalf contacted me to determine if the allegations in Paragraphs 52 and 53 of that Motion were true. I d

asonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b). Rule 11 uses an objective standard. Kaplan v. DaimlerChrysler, A.G., 331 F.3d 1251, 1255 (11th Cir. 2003). The analysis is whether "a reasonable attorney in like circumstances could believe that his actions were fact

03/25/2009 RDC Conference with Pike and Bobbie re: subpoena and stays and Motion to Compel 0.60 hr $300.00 03/25/2009 RDC Receipt and review Edwards letter re: request client's name do not appear in court filing; BB - Re-Notice of Epstein's deposition, Notice of Production from 0.30 hr $150.00

yk regarding RICO 0.30 hr $90.00 03/03/2009 JMB Conference with Robert Critton a40 iv $200.00 03/03/2009 RDC Attend two hearings i M and A.G.); conference with Sid 1.60 hr $800.00 03/03/2009 RDC Memo to all 0.40 hr $200.00 03/0312009 RDC Conference with JMB and Rita re: new Compla

Epstein has said. He also owns Little St. James. a 70-acre island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. where the main house is currently being renovated by Edward Tut- tle, a designer of the Amanresorts. Them is also a S6.8 million house in Palm Beach, Flcaida, and a fleet of antral): a Gulfitroun IV. a heli

a man who loves amok 71 new general. en—lots of them. moult,' Epstein had been running International young. Model types have *Assets Group Inc. tl.A.G.). a consulting been heard saying they aigi company. out of his apartment in the Solo full of gratitude to Eps4E building on East 66th Street in Ne

. of California, Davis University of Washington (Edwards Lecture) SouthWest Psychology Conf, London Gold

Roediger, D.L. Schacter & R.F. Thompson (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Learning and Memory. NY:: MacMillan, Vol I. Abelson, R.P., Loftus, E.F. & Greenwald, A.G. (1992) Attempts to improve the accuracy of self-reports of voting. In J.M. Tanur (Ed.) Questions about Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases