Epstein Secrets

istrict of Florida, D.C. Docket No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Attorneys and Law Firms Paul Cassell, University of Utah College of Law, SALT LAKE CTY, UT, Bradley James Edwards, Edwards Pottinger, LLC, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL, for Petitioner. Richard Christian Komando, Bradley Garrison & Komando, ORANGE PARK, FL, for Amicus C

ted. During that meeting, however, the federal prosecutors and FBI agents still did not disclose the Agreement to Wild. Then, in mid-June of 2008, Bradley Edwards, the attorney for Wild and several of Epstein's other victims, discussed with AUSA Villafafia the possibility of federal charges being filed agains

18 months' imprisonment in the county jail. Having still not been informed of the resolution of Epstein's federal case, on July 3, 2008, attorney Edwards sent a letter to the U.S. Attorney's Office communicating the victims' wishes that federal charges be filed against Epstein. II. PROCEDURAL HISTOR

tion of Epstein's federal case, on July 3, 2008, attorney Edwards sent a letter to the U.S. Attorney's Office comm

f one method of enforcing a substantive rule suggests that Congress intended to preclude others.' " Love v. Delta Air Lines, 310 F.3d 1347, 1353 (Ilth Cir. 2002) (alteration adopted) (quoting Sandoval, 532 U.S. at 290, 121 S.Ct. 1511). The dissents' criticisms of the majority opinion's application of

in, 08-CV-80893-KAM: This suit was filed by one of the victims who brought the victim's rights suit against the United States. She is represented by Brad Edwards. The Complaint raises the following claims: sexual exploitation, sexual abuse and/or sexual assault of a minor (Count 1), "Cause of Action pursuant

st the United States. She is represented by Brad Edwards. The Complaint raises the following claims: sexua

to take effective action to protect children and families from online harm") (emphasis added); see also United States'. Searcy, 418 F.3d 1193, 1197 (Ilth Cir. 2005) (noting that Congress enacted § 2422(b) "after the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing regarding child endangerment via the Internet")

ONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge for the M

or for rehearing en banc is timely only if received in the clerk's office within the time specified in the rules. Costs are governed by FRAP 39 and Ilth Cir.R. 39.1. The timing, format, and content of a motion for attorney's fees and an objection thereto is governed by 11th Cir. R. 39.2 and 39-3. Please

ONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, United States District Judge for the M

or for rehearing en banc is timely only if received in the clerk's office within the time specified in the rules. Costs are governed by FRAP 39 and Ilth Cir.R. 39.1. The timing, format, and content of a motion for attorney's fees and an objection thereto is governed by 1 I th Cir. R. 39.2 and 39-3. Plea