Epstein Secrets

d JANE DOE No. 2 v. UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 1. I

d Epstein held accountable the same way anyone else would be. I spoke about this with one of my friends around May 2008. I then called an attorney, Brad Edwards, around June 2008, understanding that he was hired to get the prosecutors to talk to us and hear the truth from me. That was especially important t

y other young teenagers to Epstein for the purpose of getting paid by Epstein. I wanted to assist the prosecutors in the investigation. I hired Mr. Edwards to let them know that I was cooperative and ready to tell them all of the helpful information I had. I understood that Mr. Edwards did that. I aut

ecutor disclosed the existence of the agreement, attorney Edwards could have taken steps to challenge the consummat

fully supported by the undisputed facts agreed to by the Government, not to mention numerous disputed facts proffered by the victims. See generally Edwards Affidavit of Aug. II, 2017, at In 11-25. To the extent that there is any ambiguity in the plain language, the CVRA's legislative history full confirms this p

IBIT 16 EFTA00081180 Case 9:08-cv-807m091349pept Z91-15 _EriterM ocp WERocisstifolf/E15 Page 2 of roio-< uoc 16q0,3 e 0 EXHIBIT C Epstein vs. Edwards Undisputed Statement of Facts EFTA00081181 Case 9:08-cv-807ailaVs kigsyffigt 28415-c1p6Arger phri N 7NRocieatgfe)10/§815 Page 3 of IN THE CIRCUI

ndants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the following specific facts as the undis

and punish Epstein for his crimes against them in whatever avenue remained open to them. On August 12, 2008, at the request of his client Jane Doe, Brad Edwards filed a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein to recover damages for his sexual assault of Jane Doe. See Edwards Affidavit, "N" at ¶7. Included in thi

ffidavit") (Exhibit "N"). 32. On June 13, 2008, attorney Edwards agreed to represent E.W.; on July 2, 2008, attorn

ook, what Edwards learned in the course of his representation of his clients, Edwards's good faith beliefs and the foundation for those beliefs, see Edwards Affidavit and specifically paragraphs 25 and 25 of that Affidavit. For clarity, depositions attached to this memorandum will be identified numerically as att

ffidavit") (Exhibit "N"). 32. On June 13, 2008, attorney Edwards agreed to represent..; on July 2, 2008, attorney

1/2015 Page 2 of 9 P ORAS Tam C leis Action Pe winal Injury Wconglul Otell Comer cal Lotqatton WWW.PATHTOJUSTICE COM Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos Et Lehrman, P.L. August 20, 2014 Wifredo A. Ferrer United States Attorney Southern District of Florida RE: Jane Does I and 21 United St

ns. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. (850) 224-7000 141004142-7011 WWW.S ARCYLAW CO

our letters and Is considering the matter, as well as your request for a meeting. I will try to get an answer for you as soon as possible. • From: Brad Edwards - Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 2:12 PM To: Redacted (OWLS); Redacted (USAFLS) Cc: Paul Cassell Subject: Doe 'US When we spoke a few months a

ook, what Edwards learned in the course of his representation of his clients, Edwards's good faith beliefs and the foundation for those beliefs, see Edwards Affidavit and specifically paragraphs 25 and 25 of that Affidavit. For clarity, depositions attached to this memorandum will be identified numerically as att

ndants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the following specific facts as the undis

this subject at his deposition, Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent rather than make an incriminating admission. Accordingly, Edwards is entitled to the adverse inference against Epstein that, had Epstein answered, the answer would have been unfavorable to him. "[I]t is well-settle

ffidavit") (Exhibit "N"). 32. On June 13, 2008, attorney Edwards agreed to represent..; on July 2, 2008, attorney

tions Edwards took, what Edwards learned in the course of his representation of his clients, goo beliefs and the foundation for those beliefs, see Edwards Affidavit and specifically paragraphs 25 and 25 of that A [davit. For clarity, depositions attached to this memorandum will be identified numerically as atta

to the limited extent that the events described concerned April 2007. Several months later, Jane Doe 2 obtained new counsel not paid for by Epstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and circumstances changed. See Edwards Decl., DE 225-1 at 17; Edwards Affidavit of Aug. 11, 2017 at 1 11, 1 16; Jane Doe 2 Decl., 361-27 at 1-2. 1

osecution — which Jane Doe 1 has specifically disputed by her affidavit. See Jane Doe 1 Decl., DE 361-26; see also Edwards Decl., DE 225-1 at 17-18; Edwards Affidavit of Aug. II, 2017 at 11 11-25; Victims S.J. Mot., DE 361 at1 71 & n.85;172 & n.86; 173 & n.87; 1 74 & n.88; 1 75 & n.89; 1 76 & n.90; 1 77

respect 12 EFTA00799885 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 415 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2017 Page 13 of 14 to what AUSA Villafana told attorney Brad Edwards. See generally Edwards Affidavit of Aug. 11, 2017, particularly at 911 11-25. Edwards Decl. (filed contemporaneously with this response). DATED: Au

ered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2017 Page 4 of 14 For example, Bradley J. Edwards represented Jane Doe 2 in July 2008. See Edwards Decl., DE 225-1 at 17; Edwards Affidavit of Aug. 11, 2017 at 1 11,1 16; Jane Doe 2 Decl., 361-27 at 1-2. 14. Admitted to the extent that the events described occurred on specific dates, and