ook, what Edwards learned in the course of his representation of his clients, Edwards's good faith beliefs and the foundation for those beliefs, see Edwards Affidavit and specifically paragraphs 25 and 25 of that Affidavit. For clarity, depositions attached to this memorandum will be identified numerically as att

tions Edwards took, what Edwards learned in the course of his representation of his clients, goo beliefs and the foundation for those beliefs, see Edwards Affidavit and specifically paragraphs 25 and 25 of that A [davit. For clarity, depositions attached to this memorandum will be identified numerically as atta

fully supported by the undisputed facts agreed to by the Government, not to mention numerous disputed facts proffered by the victims. See generally Edwards Affidavit of Aug. II, 2017, at In 11-25. To the extent that there is any ambiguity in the plain language, the CVRA's legislative history full confirms this p

ered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2017 Page 4 of 14 For example, Bradley J. Edwards represented Jane Doe 2 in July 2008. See Edwards Decl., DE 225-1 at 17; Edwards Affidavit of Aug. 11, 2017 at 1 11,1 16; Jane Doe 2 Decl., 361-27 at 1-2. 14. Admitted to the extent that the events described occurred on specific dates, and

ook, what Edwards learned in the course of his representation of his clients, Edwards's good faith beliefs and the foundation for those beliefs, see Edwards Affidavit and specifically paragraphs 25 and 25 of that Affidavit. For clarity, depositions attached to this memorandum will be identified numerically as att