Epstein Secrets

ent deposition schedule 04/08/2009 JMB Commence review of punitive damage issues 04/07/2009 RDC Prepare for and attend 2 hearings; talked with Edwards re: settlement issues and discovery 04/07/2009 RDC E-mails 04/07/2009 RDC To do; conference with Pike re: motions/responses; conference with J

sh on EW to JG, Weinberg and Spicer; scan and pdf Amended Cmplalnt on BB to JG. JE and DI; e-mail chart of records received on BB to Kuvin; call to Brad Edwards' office to obtain new e-mail address; e-mail charts of records received on Doe, EW and LM to Brad; copy e-mails for hearing folder-, copy letters fr

mail correspondence regarding reply in support of Motion to Quash 0.40 hr $120.00 04/15/2009 RHB Legal research regarding case law in Plaintiffs Response to Motion to Quash 1.10hr $330.00 04/15/2009 RHB EW - Review Amended Complaint regarding criminal allegations 0.50 hr $150.00 04/15/2009 RHB EW - Draft Reply

istrict Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehr

ERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Ave Ste 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 [email protected] 954-524-2820

Thru P-012150 Declaration of Joseph Recarey 6(e) Box #3 P-012151 Thru P-012167 Ex Parte Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas 6(e) Investigative Privilege Also contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation

SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Ave Ste 2 Fort Lauderdale FL 33301-3268 Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College o

istrict Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehr

Thru P-012150 Declaration of Joseph Recarey 6(e) Box #3 P-012151 Thru P-012167 Ex Parte Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas 6(e) Investigative Privilege Also contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation

already entered a binding non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. The government is without 6 EFTA00191204 knowledge of precisely when "Bradley J. Edwards was working on a letter to the U.S. Attorney's Office concerning the need to federally prosecute Epstein for sex offenses committed against Jane Do

rally prosecute Epstein for sex offenses committed against Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2," and, accordingly, the government denies the assertion that Edwards worked on that letter on July 3, 2008. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. 12. 13. (a) The government admits that

Thru P-012150 Declaration of Joseph Recarey 6(e) Box #3 P-012151 Thru P-012167 Ex Parte Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas 6(e) Investigative Privilege Also contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation

19, 22-23; Exhibit 99; Exhibit 101. 124 Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 62; Exhibit 63 at 4.6, 18-19, 22-23; Exhibit 99; Exhibit 101; Declaration of Brad Edwards (Exhibit 102). 35 EFTA00185492 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 36 of 57 109. Had they known that the

isonment. P-014977 thru P-014978 6/19/2008 email forwardin: 6/19/2008 email from to E. and (NB: Asserting privilege only for email. Attorney Edwards presumably has cop of his email to Attorney-Client Privilege Investigative Privilege P-014979 thru P-014980 6/23/2008 emails between . and (

Thru P-012150 Declaration of Joseph Recarey 6(e) Box #3 P-012151 Thru PM 12167 Ex Parte Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas 6(e) Investigative Privilege Also contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation

t Epstein was willing to pay huge sums of money to avoid exposing his criminal activities. The attorney representing the victims in the CVRA Action, Brad Edwards ("Edwards"), worked at the Rothstein firm. Epstein sued Edwards, alleging that Edwards was part of the Ponzi scheme, and alleging that Edwards' atte

lling to pay huge sums of money to avoid exposing his criminal activities. The attorney representing the victims in the CVRA Action, Brad Edwards ("Edwards"), worked at the Rothstein firm. Epstein sued Edwards, alleging that Edwards was part of the Ponzi scheme, and alleging that Edwards' attempts to su

"Him P-012150 Declaration of Joseph Recarey 6(e) Box #3 P-012151 Thru P-012167 Ex Pane Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas 6(e) Investigative Privilege Also contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation