Epstein Secrets

N, against Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, and are not part of the legal claims brought by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, against Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. However, this Proposal is intended to resolve all such claims if available.

Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby serves this Proposal for Settlement upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ, P. 1.442: 1. This Proposal is being made pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R

. SCOTT ROITHSTETN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DE

which could have been pled by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, against Plaintiff/Counter- FOWLER Worts LIONETT P.A. • ESPIRITO SANTO PLAZA, 1395 BIUCKIILL AVENUE, 14'. FLOOR, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131. (305) 789.9200 EFTA00804096 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG Defendant, JEFFREY EPS

N, against Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, and are not part of the legal claims brought by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, against Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. However, this Proposal is intended to resolve all such claims if available.

Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby serves this Proposal for Settlement upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442: 1. This Proposal is being made pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R

v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DE

cceptance of this Proposal must be in writing and must be an acceptance of the entire Proposal as outlined above. - 2 - FOWLER WHITE BURNER P.A. • ESPIRITO SANTO PLAZA, 1395 BRICKEI.L AVENUE, 14IN FLOOR, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 • EFTA00613868 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and cor

N, against Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, and are not part of the legal claims brought by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, against Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. However, this Proposal is intended to resolve all such claims if available.

Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby serves this Proposal for Settlement upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ, P. 1.442: 1. This Proposal is being made pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R

. SCOTT ROITHSTETN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DE

which could have been pled by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, against Plaintiff/Counter- FOWLER Worts LIONETT P.A. • ESPIRITO SANTO PLAZA, 1395 BIUCKIILL AVENUE, 14'. FLOOR, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131. (305) 789.9200 EFTA00599847 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG Defendant, JEFFREY EPS

A JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. / DRAFT 4/26/11 PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED MOTION FOR A PROTECTI

, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, was quoted as stating: I) "The sole motivation for these claims against Mr. Edwards is an attempt to intimidate him so as to abandon the justified prosecution of his claims against Mr. Epstein"; and 2) "This constitutes a very subs

led "Claim: Epstein Filed Lawsuit to `Intimidate' Attorney Edwards Prosecuting Sex Abuse Cases," Jack Scarola, Esq.

ublished an article entitled "Convicted Paedophile Jeffrey Epstein is Facing a New Criminal Investigation and is - 2 - FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • ESPIRITO SANTO PLAZA, 1395 BRICKELL AVENUE, 14m FLOOR. MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 • (305) 789-9200 EFTA00583813 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG Involved in a Civil Sui

EFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, ead-laiadividually3 Defendants. DRAFT 4/26/11 PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER

, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, was quoted as stating: I) "The sole motivation for these claims against Mr. Edwards is an attempt to intimidate him so as to abandon the justified prosecution of his claims against Mr. Epstein"; and 2) "This constitutes a very subs

led "Claim: Epstein Filed Lawsuit to `Intimidate' Attorney Edwards Prosecuting Sex Abuse Cases," Jack Scarola, Esq.

is claims against Mr. Epstein"; and 2) "This constitutes a very substantial cloud over Mr. Edwards' head." (Exhibit 1). FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • ESPIRITO SANTO PLAZA, 1395 BRICKELL AVENUE, 14m FLOOR. MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 • (305) 789-92(X) EFTA00583823 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG 2. In an article appe

A JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW

n"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby moves to dismiss the Amended Counterclaim of the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY EDWARDS ("Edwards"), and in support thereof states as follows : I. SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT Edwards' Amended Counterclaim should be dismissed because it fails to state a

roceeding was without merit. Count II also improperly commingles claims for abuse of process and malicious prosecution. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • ESPIRITO SANTO PLAZA, 1395 BRICKELL AVENUE, 14•• FLOOR. MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 • (305) 789-9200 EFTA00584348 Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXX

A JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWAR

-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards' Counterclaim, and states as follows : I. SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT Summary judgment should be entered in favor of Epstein on Edwards' single-count Counterclaim for abuse of process because it is legally insufficient. Edwards' Counterclaim does not state an actionable claim for ab

on, Edwards' claim against Epstein is barred by the litigation privilege. Partial summary judgment should be entered in FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • ESPIRITO SANTO PLAZA, 1395 BRICKELL AVENUE, 14•• FLOOR. MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131 • (305) 789-9200 EFTA00584338 Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXX

behalf of I maestcd Pam Farmer, Jafre, Weissing. Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman. P L. [email protected]

Beach County Tax Collector P.O. Box 3715 West Palm Beach, FL 33402-3715 -Ma US Mal) Paul J. McMahon, Esq. -(VIA CMIECF ) FOWLER Mum BueNErr FA. *ESPIRITO SANTO PLAZA, 1395 BRICKEU. AVMS. 14w FLOOR, M LAMI, Fweron 33131 -(305)789-9200 EFTA00286351 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1579 Filed 03/28/11 Page 3 of 3 THE LAW

behalf of I maestcd Pam Farmer, Jafre, Weissing. Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman. P L. [email protected]

Beach County Tax Collector P.O. Box 3715 West Palm Beach, FL 33402-3715 -Ma US Mal) Paul J. McMahon, Esq. -(VIA CMIECF ) FOWLER Mum BueNErr FA. *ESPIRITO SANTO PLAZA, 1395 BRICKEU. AVMS. 14w FLOOR, M LAMI, Fweron 33131 -(305)789-9200 EFTA00286365 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1579 Filed 03/28/11 Page 3 of 3 THE LAW