Epstein Secrets

amination by Mr. Lick SS Vs. 7 Redirect Examination by Mr. Scarola 131 SCOTT 0.0TNSTBIN, individually; 0 Rocones-Exaninatien by Mr. Lick 138 BRADLEY EDWARDS, Individually, 9 Further Redirect Examination by Mr. Scarola 160 Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. 10 Certificate of Oath 170 / 11 Certificate

5 5 Berger in the matter of Jeffrey 5 APPEARANCES: 6 For Plaintiff: 4 Epstein versus Scott Rothstein and Bradley 7 LINK 4 ROCKENBACH, . Edwards. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 0 9 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE , This deposition is being hold 2255 Glad

would moan -- for example, 1 when you aay -- it wasn't during the time of the 2 Mr. Scarola's firm represented a client against 2 Rothstein -- Brad Edward➢ wasn't working for the ) Mr. Epstein, right? ) Rothstein firm, I don't believe, when this happened. 4 A Correct. 4 Q When he settled? 5 Q

ity for cases from the county 4 court being appealed to the circuit court, and I worked S on those. And then I was also invited by the Fourth f District Court of Appeal, which is our appellate court / for Palm Beach County, Broward County and the Treasure • Coast. I was invited ono simmer to sit on -- to 10 si

ters were provided to her both from your Affiant and from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist. Attached hereto are copies of the letters provided to Bradley Edwards' three clients, and Your Affiant's letter to was provided by the FBI. (Ex. I ). Your A Mantis letter to III was hand-delivered by myself to at t

ed to provide notification to victims in the short time that they had. jj Although all known victims were not notified, AUSA Ilindid call attorney Edwards to provide notice to his clients regarding the hearing. AUSA did this, even though she had no obligation to provide notice of a state court hearing

fense was confirmed when she was interviewed by 'Attorney Edwards filed his Motion on behalf of "Jane Doe," without

(Cite as: 606 So.2d 1267) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, Appellant, FLORIDA SUGAR CANE LEAGUE, INC., Appellee. No. 91-3128. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. Oct. 29, 1992. *1267 An appeal from the Leon County Circuit Court; P. Kevin Davey, Judge. Robert G. Gough, Asst. Gen

ters were provided to her both from your Affiant and from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist. Attached hereto are copies of the letters provided to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. 1). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-deliver

uly 9, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE Brad Edwards, Esq. The Law Offices of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC Re: Jeffrey Epstein, IDENTIFIED VICTIM Dear Mr. Edwards: NOTIFICATION OF By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida asks that you provide the foll

fense was confirmed when she was interviewed by 'Attorney Edwards filed his Motion on behalf of "Jane Doe," without

Cite as: 606 So.2d 1267) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, Appellant, I FLORIDA SUGAR CANE LEAGUE, INC., Appellee. No. 91-3128. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. Oct. 29, 1992. *1267 An appeal from the Leon County Circuit Court; P. Kevin Davey, Judge. Robert G. Gough, Asst. Gen

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff. v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-RWS DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO MESSRS. CASSELL AND EDWARDS' RENEWED MOTIONS TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, by and through her attorneys, hereby submits the following opposition to Mess

the Court: • at 6:59 p.m., Letter Response to Motion addressed to Robert J. Sweet from Sigrid McCawley (Doc. #113). • at 7:03 p.m., Declaration of Bradley Edwards in Support of Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Doc. #114). • at 7:14 p.m., Motion for Bradley Edwards to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Doc. #115) EFTA0060544

in lawsuit also appears to still have a portion of the case on appeal. See Edwards v. Epstein and Scott Rothstein (Mr. Edwards' former law partner), District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, No. 4D14-2282. This Court advised the pro hac vice applicants that "I think it would be inappropriate for you to be c

IDA FOURTH DISTRICT, 1525 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD., WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 June 23, 2014 CASE NO.: 4D14-2282 L.T. No.: 502009CA040800XXXXM B BRADLEY J. EDWARDS v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SCOTT ROTHSTEIN Appellant / Petitioner(s) Appellee / Respondent(s) BY ORDER OF THE COURT: The jurisdiction of this cour

82 L.T. No.: 502009CA040800XXXXM B BRADLEY J. EDWARDS v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SCOTT ROTHSTEIN Appell

pate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Marshal, Daniel DiGiacomo, 4Th District Court of Appeal, 1525 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, telephone (561)242-2000; 1-800-955-8771(TDD): or I- 800-955-8770(V) via Florida Relay