Epstein Secrets

RODRIGUEZ; OBSTRUCTION Date: 10/28/2009 Synopsis: Open and assign a new 72 (Obstruction of Justice) matter. Details: On or about August of 2009, Bradley James Edwards, date of birth , was contacted by Alfredo Rodriguez, date of birth . Edwards is an attorney who is representing four fema e in ividuals who are

ustice) matter. Details: On or about August of 2009, Bradley James Edwards, date of birth , was contacted by Alfredo Rodriguez, date of birth . Edwards is an attorney who is representing four fema e in ividuals who are suing Jeffrey Epstein. Rodriguez was an employee for Epstein. Edward's deposed R

GUEZ stated that he forgot that he had these items until the past couple of months. RODRIGUEZ wanted to sell these items for $50,000.00 to attorney BRADLEY EDWARDS because he had been unable to work since losing his job with EPSTEIN. During RODRIGUEZ' employment with EPSTEIN he (RODRIGUEZ) saw naked minor fem

rson D Next Mt in Guardian 0 . ihisimms iiiitizom (Ma, Middle. I an) 177:Wala I SccurityNumber A4e/Acy T. Dale Dumnsa rmeamonyvvy I Dale or Milli OrnannIni.trrk ltncc 0 'Asian O Mack t<://reisis " 0 Amerkin . • . c ). A1 kAietbal tsiPfeiliiC. Country Colic el.: , . p White O U

f victims provided to Mr. Epstein's counsel and did not receive either of the victim notification letters. She is, however, represented by Attorney Edwards who was informed of these developments and who received both the initial and corrected victim notification letters that were sent to Jane Doe #1.

esolved on September 2, 2008, and on September 3, 2008, your Affiant sent the corrected victim notification letter to Jane Doe 41 via her attorney, Brad Edwards, Esq. 10. As explained in the July 9, 2008 Declaration, at the time that the Agreement was negotiated, Jane Doe #2 was represented by an attorney

ication letters. She is, however, represented by Attorney Edwards who was informed of these developments and who r

iolation by Mr. Epstein of § 2422(b) or 'hi ther federal statute—a denial of his rights that would insulate potential claimants such as Ms. and Ms. Milli from any challenge on this element even if under other circumstances a challenge would result in a summary judgment in Mr. Epstein's favor under Fe

f victims provided to Mr. Epstein's counsel and did not receive either of the victim notification letters. She is, however, represented by Attorney Edwards who was informed of these developments and who received both the initial and corrected victim notification letters that were sent to Jane Doe #1.

esolved on September 2, 2008, and on September 3, 2008, your Affiant sent the corrected victim notification letter to Jane Doe 41 via her attorney, Brad Edwards, Esq. 10. As explained in the July 9, 2008 Declaration, at the time that the Agreement was negotiated, Jane Doe #2 was represented by an attorney

ication letters. She is, however, represented by Attorney Edwards who was informed of these developments and who r

olation by Mr. Epstein of § 2422(b) or any other federal statute—a denial of his rights that would insulate potential claimants such as Ms. ad Ms. Milli from any challenge on this element even if under other circumstances a challenge would result in a summary judgment in Mr. Epstein's favor under Fe

pam me too Just like I said a few days ago Huw Edwards is your guy. I believe' _ and I • are con art

BURISMA email between Hunter Biden & Henri du Pont. 4•10.1imm MI WSW Iletiminolap Agoolas Igia•p irsano. OM 01••• vi.•••• •••4••• Pt IS Ms. a Milli arn• %Ilia 1110 111.01,•• telanainamoi Ant laraionto• my,. mm • Asensio iMo• NMI" MS IMO 4dyvittonahervey • bm Rom Create Mod* Ili Maria