Epstein Secrets

ters were provided to her both from your Affiant and from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist. Attached hereto are copies of the letters provided to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. 11. Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-deliver

e initially refused to speak with investigators. S.R.'s status as a victim of a federal offense was confirmed when she was interviewed by 'Attorney Edwards filed his Motion on behalf of "Jane Doe," without identifying which of his clients is the purported victim. Accordingly, I will address facts relate

fense was confirmed when she was interviewed by 'Attorney Edwards filed his Motion on behalf of "Jane Doe," without

17847, at *1-2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005) (Francis I) (staying federal civil action in favor of "a criminal case currently pending in state court in Bay County, Florida, arising from the same facts and involving the same parties as the Instant action," noting that "the language of 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) is cl

ters were provided to her both from your Affiant and from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist. Attached hereto are copies of the letters provided to Bradley Edwards' three clients, and Your Affiant's letter to was provided by the FBI. (Ex. I ). Your A Mantis letter to III was hand-delivered by myself to at t

ed to provide notification to victims in the short time that they had. jj Although all known victims were not notified, AUSA Ilindid call attorney Edwards to provide notice to his clients regarding the hearing. AUSA did this, even though she had no obligation to provide notice of a state court hearing

fense was confirmed when she was interviewed by 'Attorney Edwards filed his Motion on behalf of "Jane Doe," without

17847, at *1-2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005) (Francis I) (staying federal civil action in favor of "a criminal case currently pending in state court in Bay County, Florida, arising from the same facts and involving the same parties as the Instant action," noting that "the language of 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) is cl

ters were provided to her both from your Affiant and from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist. Attached hereto are copies of the letters provided to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. 1). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-deliver

uly 9, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE Brad Edwards, Esq. The Law Offices of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC Re: Jeffrey Epstein, IDENTIFIED VICTIM Dear Mr. Edwards: NOTIFICATION OF By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida asks that you provide the foll

fense was confirmed when she was interviewed by 'Attorney Edwards filed his Motion on behalf of "Jane Doe," without

17847, at *1-2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005) (Francis I) (staying federal civil action in favor of "a criminal case currently pending in state court in Bay County, Florida, arising from the same facts and involving the same parties as the Instant action," noting that "the language of 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) is cl