Epstein Secrets

icial at the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Treasury Department, with the unauthorized leaking of suspicious activity reports. U.S. v. Edwards, 19 Cr. 64 (GWR). EFTA00025171 --- PAGE BREAK --- State of the Office 2018 Page 2 The Unit's work in 2019 extended beyond the traditional realm

ance, including campaign finance and related charges against Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman, among others; extortion and fraud charges against attorney Michael Avenatti, and sex trafficking charges against former financier Jeffrey Epstein. At the local level, the Unit successfully prosecuted both local and federal

tion charges against attorney Michael Avenatti for attempting to extort tens of millions of dollars from the athletic apparel company, Nike. U.S. v. Avenatti, 19 Cr. 373 (PGG). Avenatti was also charged in a separate scheme to defraud his former client Stephanie Clifford ailda "Stormy Daniels," who had b

enatti (USAO # 2019R00279) (Podolsky/Boone/Sobelman) (J. Gardephe) (PC): Charges of extortion against Avenatti. 37 EFTA00095027 1/21/20 U.S. v. Edwards (USAO # 2018R00675) (Richenthal/Ravener) (J. Woods) (PC): Charges of unlawfully disseminating suspicious activity reports (SARs) against a high-lev

t a DHS facility. 11/18/19 U.S. v. Michael Avenatti (USAO # 2019R00279) (Podolsky/Boone/Sobelman) (J. Gardephe) (PC): Charges of extortion against Avenatti. 37 EFTA00095027 1/21/20 U.S. v. Edwards (USAO # 2018R00675) (Richenthal/Ravener) (J. Woods) (PC): Charges of unlawfully disseminating suspicio

NYC Department of Homeless Services police officer for engaging in excessive force against a homeless patient at a DHS facility. 11/18/19 U.S. v. Michael Avenatti (USAO # 2019R00279) (Podolsky/Boone/Sobelman) (J. Gardephe) (PC): Charges of extortion against Avenatti. 37 EFTA00095027 1/21/20 U.S. v. Edward

truth, as alleged, was almost unspeakable." Id Plaintiff's counsel piled on, offering their own opinions about Ms. Maxwell's guilt. For example, Mr. Edwards opined that Ms. Maxwell was "a main facilitator" of Mr. Epstein's crimes who "started the whole thing." Id. Ms. McCawley praised the prosecutors: "

ial jurors, to incriminating evidence that the law has determined may not be used to support a conviction"), cited with approval in United States a Avenatti , (S1) 19 CR 373 PGG, 2020 WL 70952, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2020). Based on these cases, the Court may make specific findings supporting the sealin

truth, as alleged, was almost unspeakable." Id Plaintiff's counsel piled on, offering their own opinions about Ms. Maxwell's guilt. For example, Mr. Edwards opined that Ms. Maxwell was "a main facilitator" of Mr. Epstein's crimes who "started the whole thing." Id Ms. McCawley praised the prosecutors: "[

al jurors, to incriminating evidence that the law has determined may not be used to support a conviction"), cited with approval in United States v. Avenatti , (S1) 19 CR 373 PGG, 2020 WL 70952, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2020). Based on these cases, the Court may make specific findings supporting the sealin