Epstein Secrets

ed the case for investigation. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at 1 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration"). The Pa

ge of Law. During the call, Ms. Garvin was not advised that a non-prosecution agreement had been reached in this matter. 34. In mid-June 2008, Mr. Edwards contacted AUSA to inform her that he represented Jane Doe #1 and, later, Jane Doe #2. Mr. Edwards asked to meet to provide information about the f

lients regarding the hearing. AUSA did not tell Attorney Edwards that the guilty pleas in state court would bring

idea of the charged that we had planned to bring as related to 18 USC 2255." Id. The e- mail also asked permission from Epstein's counsel to send to Ocariz a copy of parts of the plea agreement: "With respect to question 2 [a question from Ocariz regarding "[w]hen will it be possible to see the plea ag

n the more accurate term "boyfriend" to describe the connection. Id. at 268 Lefkowitz further stated the boyfriend had a business relationship with Ocariz and that the boyfriend would have financially benefitted from the presumably lucrative referral of sexual assault cases against Epstein to Ocariz.

also investigating the case. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at & & 1-2 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration").

ane Doe #2 was represented by counsel that was paid for by the criminal target Epstein and, accordingly, all contact was made through that attorney. Edwards Declaration at & 5. 7. In and around September 2007, plea discussions took place between Jeffrey Epstein, represented by numerous attorneys (incl

lients regarding the hearing. AUSA did not tell Attorney Edwards that the guilty pleas in state court would bring

idea of the charges that we had planned to bring as related to 18 USC 2255." Id. The e-mail also asked permission from Epstein's counsel to send to Ocariz a copy of parts of the plea agreement: "With respect to question 2 [a question from Ocariz regarding "[w]hen will it be possible to see the plea ag

Lefkowitz also stated that had misleadingly used the term "friend" rather than the more accurate term "boyfriend" to describe who had recommended Ocariz. Id. at 268. Lefkowitz further stated the boyfriend had a business relationship with Ocariz and that the boyfriend would have financially benefitt

ed the case for investigation. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at 1 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration"). The Pa

ge of Law. During the call, Ms. Garvin was not advised that a non-prosecution agreement had been reached in this matter. 34. In mid-June 2008, Mr. Edwards contacted AUSA to inform her that he represented Jane Doe #1 and, later, Jane Doe #2. Mr. Edwards asked to meet to provide information about the f

lients regarding the hearing. AUSA did not tell Attorney Edwards that the guilty pleas in state court would bring

idea of the charged that we had planned to bring as related to 18 USC 2255." Id. The e- mail also asked permission from Epstein's counsel to send to Ocariz a copy of parts of the plea agreement: "With respect to question 2 [a question from Ocariz regarding "[w]hen will it be possible to see the plea ag

n the more accurate term "boyfriend" to describe the connection. Id. at 268 Lefkowitz further stated the boyfriend had a business relationship with Ocariz and that the boyfriend would have financially benefitted from the presumably lucrative referral of sexual assault cases against Epstein to Ocariz.

also investigating the case. See Declaration of Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. at & & 1-2 (hereinafter "Edwards Declaration").

ane Doe #2 was represented by counsel that was paid for by the criminal target Epstein and, accordingly, all contact was made through that attorney. Edwards Declaration at & 5. 7. In and around September 2007, plea discussions took place between Jeffrey Epstein, represented by numerous attorneys (incl

ents regarding the hearing. AUSA a did not tell Attorney Edwards that the guilty pleas in state court would bring

idea of the charges that we had planned to bring as related to 18 USC 2255." Id. The e-mail also asked permission from Epstein's counsel to send to Ocariz a copy of parts of the plea agreement: "With respect to question 2 [a question from Ocariz regarding "[w]hen will it be possible to see the plea ag

Lefkowitz also stated that had misleadingly used the term "friend" rather than the more accurate term "boyfriend" to describe who had recommended Ocariz. Id. at 268. Lefkowitz further stated the boyfriend had a business relationship with Ocariz and that the boyfriend would have financially benefitt

have counsel state their appearances? MR. HOROWITZ: Adam Horowitz, counsel for plaintiffs Jane 2 through Jane Doe 7. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane Doe. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. : Good morning, Your Honor. Sid for Jane Doe II. THE COURT: Good

sel state their appearances? MR. HOROWITZ: Adam Horowitz, counsel for plaintiffs Jane 2 through Jane Doe 7. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane Doe. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. : Good morning, Your Honor. Sid for Jane Doe II. THE COURT: Good morning. MR.

ard Miami, FL 33160 305.931.2200 For Jane Doe BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. 17 Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Ola

se is that I "assiduously" hid from you the fact that Bert Ocariz is a friend of my boyfriend and that I have a "longstanding relationship" with Mr. Ocariz. EFTA00185239 JAY P. LEFICOWITZ, ESQ. DECEMBER 13, 2007 PAGE 2 OF 5 I informed you that I selected Mr. Ocariz because he was a friend and class

ther plaintiffs' attorneys, such as First AUSA Sloman's former law partner, Jeffrey Herman (see below), and Ms. Villafana's confidential informant, Brad Edwards (see below), to obtain assistance from Ms. Villafana and the USAO in their cases against Mr. Epstein. Moreover, during the course of the civil liti

("RRA"). RRA, Mr. Rothstein and others at RRA perpetrated the largest Ponzi scheme in Florida's history, using the very same civil cases that Mr. Edwards litigated against Mr. Epstein to fleece investors out of millions of dollars. Incredibly, Ms. Villafana was working with Mr. Edwards on this obstruc

osely and personally connected to Ms. Villafana's own live-in boyfriend. Upon learning of this fact, United States Attorney Alex Acosta removed Mr. Ocariz from consideration. Mr. Epstein's attorney, Joe Whitley, a former United States Assistant Attorney General, predicted that the unprecedented incorp

to paragraph 29 of DE361, copies of emails sent to and from my personal email address were produced in discovery. Pursuant to my agreement with Mr. Edwards (counsel for Petitioners), personal email addresses were redacted. Some of those emails are included in the exhibits attached to Petitioners' motio

6/02/2017 Page 21 of 176 37. In mid-June 2008, Attorney Edwards contacted your Affiant to inform me that he repr

se is that I "assiduously" hid from you the fact that Bert Ocariz is a friend of my boyfriend and that I have a "longstanding relationship" with Mr. Ocariz. I GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT EFTA00799652 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 403-19 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 49 of 176 JAY P. LEFKOWFTZ, E

tes District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehr

Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 (954) 524-2820 Fax: (954) 524-2822 E-mail: brad@Dathtoi

close to her would personally profit. Ms. inappropriately attempted to nominate Bert Oeariz liar attorney representative. despite t e act that Mr. Ocariz turns out to be a very good personal friend or ms. vmatcanis boyfriend, a fact she assiduously kept hidden from counsel. We requested alternate cho

l Summary Judgment with Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed on February 10, 2016 as DE 361. DATED: February 10, 2016 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Te

bruary 10, 2016 as DE 361. DATED: February 10, 2016 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 524-2820 Facsimile (954) 524-2822 E-mai

t 11C*Y Skik,haNiali$11 14.413/I'Vl‘alek, lietbiaMkiMta "Jay Lefkowitz" <[email protected] Conference call Hi Jay — Have you approved Mr. Ocariz as the girls' representative? And can we have a conference call to discuss what I may disclose to him and to the girls regarding the agreement? Th

im's Reply to Opposition to Victim's Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement in Jane Doe No. 1, et aL v. M., 08-80736; 2) 10/9/2008 letter from Edwards48 tee: false statements by the government; and 3) 10/15/2008 letter from Edwards to ■ re: whether Epstein violated the non-prosecution agreement 2

re: publicity of non-prosecution agreement 101. 9/24/2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement 102. 9/25/2007, 12:11 pm Email from to Lefkowitz re: Mr. Ocariz as representative 103. 9/25/2007, 8:36 pm Email from to Lefkowitz re: options for representative 104. 9/26/2007, 11:01 am Emails between an