Epstein Secrets

Letter Community Control Order (in JE's Criminal Case) Summary of Arguments Regarding Work Release (by Kirkland & Ellis) EFTA00300515 Letter to Jay Lefkowitz from US Attorney, July 7, 2009 Kreusler-Walsh Summary of Law RE Stays Pending Appeal Indictment Drafts & Misc JEE Criminal Matter Sentence Order

y Kirkland & Ellis) EFTA00300515 Letter to Jay Lefkowitz from US Attorney, July 7, 2009 Kreusler-Walsh Su

Forms 10. Arbitration Correspondence from Stacy E. Yeung II. Joint Ltr Re Extension until Sept. 16 Submitted by FINRA (Bear Steams arbitration re Spector) FTC BEAR STEARNS LITIGATION III WORKING FILE Bear Stearns 1. Correspondence 2. FTC Customer Agreement 3. Customer Agreement 4. Storch Invoice

derdale, FL 33394 For U.S.A. 954.356.7255 17 MARTIN G. WEINBERG, ESQ. 18 20 Park Plaza Boston MA 02116 19 (Via telephone) 617.227.3700 20 JAY LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. (Via telephone) 21 REPORTED BY: LARRY HERR L RPR-RMR-FCRR-AE 22 official United States Court Reporter Federally Certified Realtime Repor

02116 19 (Via telephone) 617.227.3700 20 JAY LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. (Via telephone) 21 REPORTED BY: LARRY H

strictly 16 through rose-colored glasses. 17 And in this particular instance, we simply can't 18 defend this case or take certain action with the Spector 19 hanging over us that, in fact, the Government may deem it to be 20 a violation of the NPA, because very clearly in their response 21 papers, th

Weiss Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 East Broward Boulevard 16 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 For U.S.A. 17 18 19 20 21 MARTIN G. WEINBERG, ESQ. JAY LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. (Via telephone) REPORTED BY: LARRY HERR, RPR-RMR-FCRR-AE 22 Official United States Court Reporter Federally Certified Realtime Reporter

17 18 19 20 21 MARTIN G. WEINBERG, ESQ. JAY LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. (Via telephone) REPORTED BY: LARRY HERR,

strictly 16 through rose-colored glasses. 17 And in this particular instance, we simply can't 18 defend this case or take certain action with the Spector 19 hanging over us that, in fact, the Government may deem it to be 20 a violation of the NPA, because very clearly in their response 21 papers, th