Epstein Secrets

mptly retained New York counsel and sought a brief adjournment to provide counsel an opportunity to prepare for the hearing. See A.77 (Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz, dated Sept. 7, 2010). In October 2010, Appellant's counsel submitted a detailed memorandum to the Assistant District Attorne

To be Argued By: JAY P. LEFKOWITZ New York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010 .e

Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, Commentary at 5, ¶ 7 (2006). Accordingly, the Order 6 By previewing for the Appellate Court "[t]he People's evidence on remand," see Resp. Br. at 62, n. 7, the People have improperly introduced materials dehors the record. See Mount Lucas

re for the hearing. See A.77 (Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz, dated Sept. 9, 2010). In

omptly retained New York counsel and sought a brief adjournment to provide counsel an opportunity to prepare for the hearing. See A.77 (Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz, dated Sept. 9, 2010). In October 2010, Appellant's counsel submitted a detailed memorandum to the Assistant District Attorn

he People's Attempt to Introduce Materials Outside the Record Was Improper and Reference to Such Contentions Should Be Stricken. By previewing for the Appellate Court in their brief "the People's evidence on remand," see Resp. Br. at 62, n. 7, the People have improperly introduced materials dehors the record. See

omptly retained New York counsel and sought a brief adjournment to provide counsel an opportunity to prepare for the hearing. See A.77 (Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz, dated Sept. 9, 2010). In October 2010, Appellant's counsel submitted a detailed memorandum to the Assistant District Attorn

are for the hearing. See A.77 (Letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz to Hon. Ruth Pickholz, dated Sept. 9, 2010). In

to which Appellant ultimately pled guilty.5 Resp. Br. at 62, n. 7. By so doing, the People themselves unwittingly concede that 5 By previewing for the Appellate Court "the People's evidence on remand," see Resp. Br. at 62, n. 7, the People have improperly introduced materials dehors the record. See Mount Lucas As

As set forth in caption. There has been no change in the parties. 3. NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT OR PETITIONER: Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C. Sandra Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, Ne 4611 Telephone: Facsimile: 4. NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE N

OW PENDING IN ANY COURT OF THIS OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION. 10. THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL APPEAL PENDING IN THIS ACTION. Dated: February 9, 2011 Ja . Lefkowitz, P.C. S dra Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, 111.1611 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant

er of simply filing a writ of petition and that stays the release of the order. There would have to be a separate motion that would be filed with the Appellate Court. The Motion to Stay that we file under 9.310, subsection A, it party that seeks review Appellate Rule provides that the shall come to the lowe

d: February 9, 2011 To: Clerk, New York County Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. NEW YORK DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE One Hogan Place New York, NY Telephone: Lefkowitz, P.C. a Lynn Musumeci KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, Ne Telephone: Faccim; Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey E. E P'ILED

er of simply filing a writ of petition and that stays the release of the order. There would have to be a separate motion that would be filed with the Appellate Court. The Motion to Stay that we file under 9.310, subsection A, it party that seeks review Appellate Rule provides that the shall come to the lowe