Epstein Secrets

. .3582800 Fax • For i ne www.podhurst.com EFTA00722775 We are concerned that Mr. Epstein could misconstrue our impasse in conjunction with Mr. Lefkowitz' e-mail to mean that now that we are no longer "representing them in connection with settlement discussions," he may contact them. Please be assured

sented by us. If this correspondence is in any way unclear, please contact us. Sincerely, Robed C. Josefsberg cc: Roy Black, Esq. w/ enclosures Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. w/ enclosures EFTA00722776 List of Clients Represented by Podhurst. Orseck as of April 17. 2009' ' We will supplement this list as necessa

ber er & Weis P.A. Re: Jane Doe 101 vs. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 09-80591-Civ-Marra Gentlemen: Robert Orseck (1934-1978) Walter R Beckham, Jr. Karen Podhurst Dem Of Counsel Attached please find the Summons and Complaint filed in U.S. District Court today. Jack Goldberger and Bob Critton had previously a

counsel, any contact with any of our clients or their family members by Mr. Epstein, his counsel and/or his agents must strictly be through us. Mr. Leftowitz had previously reassured us that Mr. Epstein would not contact any of our clients as long as I am "representing them in connection with settlement

ctims represented by us. If this correspondence is in any way unclear, please contact us. Sincerely, o il Pig cc: Roy Black, Esq. w/ enclosures Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. w/ enclosures EFTA00728357 List of Clients Represented by Podhurst, Orseck P.A. as of April 17. 2009' I We will supplement this list as ne

ger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Gentlemen: Robert Orseck (1934-1918) Walter H. Beckham, Jr. Karen Podhurst Dem Of Counsel During our recent meeting with Mr. Black, we were told that it is your client's position that the no-contact order agreed to during

Fort Lauderdale 954A634346 www.podhurstcom EFTA00601091 We are concerned that Mr. Epstein could misconstrue our impasse in conjunction with Mr. Lefkowitz' e-mail to mean that now that we are no longer "representing them in connection with settlement discussions," he may contact them. Please be assured

sented by us. If this correspondence is in any way unclear, please contact us. Sincerely, Robed C. Josefsberg cc: Roy Black, Esq. w/ enclosures Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. w/ enclosures EFTA00601092 List of Clients Represented by Podhurst. Orseck as of April 17. 2009' ' We will supplement this list as necessa

lm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Jane Doe 101 vs. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 09-80591-Civ-Marra Gentlemen: Robert Orseck (1934-1978) Walter R Beckham, Jr. Karen Podhurst Dem Of Counsel Attached please find the Summons and Complaint filed in U.S. District Court today. Jack Goldberger and Bob Critton had previously a

behalf of a victim. The Recent Settlement During the last six months there have been meetings, emails and phone conversations between Roy Black, Jay Lefkowitz and Bob Josefsberg that corroborate our position. Please check with Jay and Roy as to their recollection of these matters. Despite his putting up o

s and phone conversations between Roy Black, Jay Lefkowitz and Bob Josefsberg that corroborate our position.

uite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Epstein Case Our File No.: 30608 Dear Bob: June 8, 2009 Robert Orseck p9344978) waiter IL Beckham/ Jr- Karen Podhurst Dan Of Counsel I was shocked when I heard from Bob Josefsberg that Jeffrey Epstein and counsel do not recall, or have decided to ignore, his contr

Marks Victor M. Diaz, Jr. Katherine W. Bzell Stephen P. Rosenthal Ricardo M. Martfnez-Cid Ramon A. Rasco Alexander T. Rundlet John Gravante, Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 153 East 53ffi Street New York, NY 10022-4611 Dear Mr. Lcficowitz: February 20, 2009 Robert Orseck

sco Alexander T. Rundlet John Gravante, Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 15

up Center 153 East 53ffi Street New York, NY 10022-4611 Dear Mr. Lcficowitz: February 20, 2009 Robert Orseck (19344978) Walter H. Beckham, Jr. Karen Podhurst Dem Of Counsel I received your letter dated February 13, 2009. What your client is doing is obvious, and it is in breach of his Non-Prosecution Ag