Epstein Secrets

ce e-mails attached Suppl. Box 3 P-013847 Thru P-013849 E-mail to and September 18, 2007, 11:43 , RE: Draft Agreements?, with e-mail from Jay Leflcowitz (September 18, 2007, 11:09 M. attached Atty work-product Suppl. Box 3 P-013850 E-mail, to Alex Acosta and September 18, 2007, 9:31 RE: Epste

torney handwritten notes Attorney-Client Privilege Work Product Suppl. Box #3 P-013334 Thru P-013337 File folder entitled "11/13/07 Sloman to Lefkowitz (was this sent?" containing draft 11/13/07 letter from responding to J. Lefkowitz's letter Attorney-Client Privilege Work Product Page 2 of 14

P-013334 Thru P-013337 File folder entitled "11/13/07 Sloman to Lefkowitz (was this sent?" containing draft 11/13/07 letter from responding to J. Lefkowitz's letter Attorney-Client Privilege Work Product Page 2 of 14 EFTA00185415 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 216-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/27/20

ims in the in Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18-19, 22-23; Exhibit 99; Exhibit 101; Exhibit 102. 136 us_Atty_cor. 00323 (Exhibit 103); RFP WPB 000515.000520 (Exhibit 104). 127 Exhibit 99. 36 EFTA00185493 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 37 of 57 federal case were aware o

orney's Office has not produced any emails sent to or from any home e-mail addresses of its prosecutors. 30. On September 17, 2007, defense counsel Jay Leflcowitz responded: "[D]o you have another obstruction proffer I can review that you have drafted? Also, if we go that route, would you intend to make the d

tempted to notify or confer with the victims about the existence of the NPA. 35. On September 23, 2007, the U.S. Attorney's Office sent an email to Lefkowitz stating: "It is factually accurate that the list we are going to give you are persons we have identified as victims. If we did not think they were

ims in the 125 Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18.19, 22-23; Exhibit 99; Exhibit 101; Exhibit 102. 126 US_Atty_Cor. 00323 (Exhibit 103); RFP WPB 000515.000520 (Exhibit 104). 127 Exhibit 99. 36 EFTA00804363 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 37 of 57 federal case were aware o

orney's Office has not produced any emails sent to or from any home e-mail addresses of its prosecutors. 30. On September 17, 2007, defense counsel Jay Leflcowitz responded: "[D]o you have another obstruction proffer I can review that you have drafted? Also, if we go that route, would you intend to make the d

tempted to notify or confer with the victims about the existence of the NPA. 35. On September 23, 2007, the U.S. Attorney's Office sent an email to Lefkowitz stating: "It is factually accurate that the list we are going to give you are persons we have identified as victims. If we did not think they were

ims in the 125 Exhibit 26; Exhibit 27; Exhibit 63 at 4-6, 18.19, 22-23; Exhibit 99; Exhibit 101; Exhibit 102. 126 US_Atty_Cor. 00323 (Exhibit 103); RFP WPB 000515.000520 (Exhibit 104). 127 Exhibit 99. 36 EFTA00591640 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 37 of 57 federal case were aware o