Epstein Secrets

ument 113-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2009 Page 3 of 4 We are concerned that Mr. Epstein could misconstrue our impasse in conjunction with Mr. Lefkowitz' e-mail to mean that now that we are no longer "representing them in connection with settlement discussions," be may contact them. Plessebe assuredt

nted by us. If this correspondence is in any way unclear, please contact us. Sincerely, Robert C. Joierfsberg cc: Roy Black, Esq. w/ enclosures Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. w/ enclosures EFTA00779793 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 113-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2009 Page 4 of 4 List of Clients Represent

Defendant. CASE NO.: 013CV80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff; vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOB NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOITNSON Plainti

sistant U.S. Attorney 7 PHONE NO, _ 561-209-1047 _- | COMMENTS: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012612 TAB 24 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012613 "Villafana, Ann Marie C. To “Jay Lefkowitz" Sinn \(USAFLS\)" cc bec 09/19/2007 12:14 PM Subject RE: Meeting Judge Johnson has duty next week. Jay — [hate to have to be firm about this, but

Jay Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center | 153 E. 53™ St. New York, NY 10022-4611 Re: Investigation of Jeffery Epstein Dear Mr. Lefkowitz: Pursuant to your request and the request of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, we have independently evaluated certain issues raised in the investi

ourt for the purpose of initlating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.) DEFENDANTS JEFFREY EPSTEIN (a) PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NO. 3, ) (b) COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED PLAINTIFF PALM BEACH COUNTY (EXCEPT IN U.S, PLAINTIFF CASES) COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED DEFE

formal or informal, where the answers might incriminate him in future proceedings." See Edwin v. Price, 778 F.2d 668, 669 (11th Cir. 1985) (citing Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70, 77 (1973)). The privilege is accorded liberal construction in favor of the right and extends not only to answers that would

Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintif

mal or informal, where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings." Edwin v. Price, 778 F.2d 668, 669 (11th Cir. 1985)(citing Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70. 77 (1973)). The privilege is accorded "liberal construction in favor of the right it was intended to secure," Hoffman v. Un

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 242 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2009 Page 2 of 22 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRNJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 7, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant

t of Florida DELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 15

ES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON Plainti