Epstein Secrets

AFLS) Subject: Re: Follow up - Thanks. Jeff, are we all set? Jay Original Message From: " , (USAFLS)" Sent: 10/18/2007 12:15 PM AST To: Jay Lefkowitz Cc: " , Jeff (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Follow up Jeff -- Can you see any issues with this? If not, please confirm with Jay. Original Message From: J

d by the FBI to confirm whether they were 17 or 18 at the time of their activity with Mr. Epstein." See Tab 26, September 24, 2007 Email from M. to J. Lefkowitz (emphasis added). This statement indicated that, at least the "six others" (and, as it turns out, all those identified except two) had reached the a

to confer with your co-counsel regarding this matter. Although the language of Paragraph 8 could be so construed, our First Assistant informed Mr. Lefkowitz some weeks ago that this was not our position. As Mr. Lefkowitz has noted, were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims in a subsequen

arly hooking at least IS years old. 'worn Statement at 38-39). In fact. there is no evidence that Mr. At the December 14 meeting. we also discussed Tatum Miller as emblematic of our concerns surrounding 11w government's selection or "victims," As you are aware. Ms. Miller RFP MIA 000042 EFTA00184925 12/2

kinson, Karen (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Subject Letter re Epstein and Protective Order Good morning, everyone. I have attached a letter from Jay Lefkowitz that came in by fax on Friday night. The good news is that they seem to be in agreement regarding Mr. Josefsberg. Most of the letter doesn't really

Court. If Ms. Robson would like to review the Agreement, please let me know, and I will forward a copy of the Protective Order for her signature." Lefkowitz objects, but I am wondering whether Dexter agrees that the spirit of our discussions with Judge Marra requires such a notification. If we make the e

rovided enough information that we were prepared to include them in the indictment i.e., the New York girls — and that you do not want me to re-add Tatum Miller to the list, even though we have extensive corroboration of her involvement with Epstein. Can someone please confirm? Thank you all. << File: 0808

inson, Karen (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Subject: Letter re Epstein and Protective Order Good morning, everyone. I have attached a letter from Jay Lefkowitz that came in by fax on Friday night. The good news is that they seem to be in agreement regarding Mr. Josefsberg. Most of the letter doesn't really

Court. If Ms. Robson would like to review the Agreement, please let me know, and I will forward a copy of the Protective Order for her signature." Lefkowitz objects, but I am wondering whether Dexter agrees that the spirit of our discussions with Judge Marra requires such a notification. If we make the e

vided enough information that we were prepared to include them in the indictment — i.e., the New York girls — and that you do not want me to re-add Tatum Miller to the list, even though we have extensive corroboration of her involvement with Epstein. Can someone please confirm? Thank you all. « File: 08082

inson, Karen (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Subject: Letter re Epstein and Protective Order Good morning, everyone. I have attached a letter from Jay Lefkowitz that came in by fax on Friday night. The good news is that they seem to be in agreement regarding Mr. Josefsberg. Most of the letter doesn't really

Court. If Ms. Robson would like to review the Agreement, please let me know, and I will forward a copy of the Protective Order for her signature." Lefkowitz objects, but I am wondering whether Dexter agrees that the spirit of our discussions with Judge Marra requires such a notification. If we make the e

vided enough information that we were prepared to include them in the indictment — i.e., the New York girls — and that you do not want me to re-add Tatum Miller to the list, even though we have extensive corroboration of her involvement with Epstein. Can someone please confirm? 132 EFTA00179942 Thank you

kinson, Karen (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Subject: Letter re Epstein and Protective Order Good morning, everyone. have attached a letter from Jay Lefkowitz that came in by fax on Friday night. The good news is that they seem to be in agreement regarding Mr. Josefsberg. Most of the letter doesn't really

Court. If Ms. Robson would like to review the Agreement, please let me know, and I will forward a copy of the Protective Order for her signature." Lefkowitz objects, but I am wondering whether Dexter agrees that the spirit of our discussions with Judge Main requires such a notification. If we make the en

vided enough information that we were prepared to include them in the indictment — i.e., the New York girls — and that you do not want me to re-add Tatum Miller to the list, even though we have extensive corroboration of her involvement with Epstein. Can someone please confirm? Thank you all. 080822 kowit

al statutes that have been identified by prosecutors-1S U.S.C. 1591.2422(b), and 2423(b). (Inv of the other members of Mr. Epstein's defense team, Jay Letkowitz, has personally reviewed tho reporter's contemporaneous news. Although some of the women alleged to he involved were 16 arid 17 years of age, sever

ember 20. So we will plan to proceed on one that date." October 18, 2007 email from Jay Lefkowitz to USA R. Alexander Acosta. On the same day, Mr. Lelkowitz confirmed with First Assistant Jeffrey H. Sloman that this postponement " will not affect when Epstein begins serving his sentence." 2 Corresponden

ederal prosecutors during the negotiations of a deterred prosecution agreement. The consistent representations of key Government wimesses (such as Tatum Miller. Brittany Beak, Saige Gonzalez. and Jennifer Laduke) confirm the following critical points: First, there was no communication, telephonic or otherw

ered to join the trial team and provide additional support from CEOS. On September 7, 2007, U.S. Attorney Acosta met with Kirkland & Ellis partners Jay Lefkowitz and former Solicitor General Ken Starr and Ms. Sanchez, along with Chief Oosterbahn and AUSAs» John McMillan, and FAUSA Sloman, Messrs. Starr and L

mber 20. So we will plan to proceed on one that date." October 18, 2007 email from Jay Lefkowitz to USA It. Alexander Acosta. On the same day, Mr. Lefkowitz confirmed with First Assistant Jeffrey H. Sloman that this postponement " will not affect when Epstein begins serving his sentence." 2 Corresponden

so to the public on her web page where she posted a nude photo clearly looking at least IX years old. At the December 14 meeting. we also discussed Tatum Miller as emblematic of our concerns surrounding the government's selection of "victims." As you are mare, Ms. Miller Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013355

rd to your response to the concerns we have raised that have not yet been addressed. wish you a very happy and a healthy new year. Sincerely. v . Lefkojitz cc : Honorable Alice Fisher. Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey II. Sloman. First Assistant U.S. Attorney RFP MIA 000047 EFTA00184930 Case 9:0

s" contradicts claims made by federal prosecutors during the negotiations of a deterred prosecution agreement. re )resumat. ent witnesses (such as Tatum Miller. confirm the following critical points: WI, there was no T O CJWISC, that meets the requirements of § 2422(4 For instance. Ms confirmed that Mr

tatutes that have been identified by prosecutors-~18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2422(b), and 2423(b). 1 One of the other members of Mr. Epstein's defense team, Jay Lefkowitz, has personally reviewed the reporter’s contemporaneous notes. 2 Although some of the women alleged to be involved were 16 and 17 years of age, seve

other members of Mr. Epstein's defense team, Jay Lefkowitz, has personally reviewed the reporter’s contempor

federal prosecutors during the negotiations of a deferred prosecution agreement. The consistent representations of key Government witnesses (such as Tatum Miller, Brittany Beale, Saige Gonzalez, and Jennifer Laduke) confirm the following critical points: First, there was no communication, telephonic or otherwi