Epstein Secrets

Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz [DE 78] at 6. Second, also in opposing the intervention of attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowtiz, the plaintiffs argued that "[o]nly Epstein has an interest in the validity of the non-prosecution agreement . . . ." Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2's R

ment of inconvenience does not go far because many of the issues raised by Mr. Epstein parallel the issues raised by attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Letkowitz as well as those raised during the August 12, 2011 hearing, and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 do not have to file their responsive pleadings addressing

ment 93 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2011 Page 3 of 9 First, they argued in their opposition to the intervention of attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowitz that Mr. Epstein "is the real party in interest" and that "harm from the release of the materials (if any) could be only to Jeffrey Epstein." Jane D

materials (if any) could be only to Jeffrey Epstein." Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Response To Motion To Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz [DE 78] at 6. Second, also in opposing the intervention of attorneys Black, Weinberg, and Lefkowtiz, the plaintiffs argued that "[o]nly Epstein has

o 7-15-11 Westlaw. (C) 2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. END OF DOCUMENT @ 2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 2of2 EFTA00177877 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 93 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DIST

pellees. Martin G. Weinberg, Martin G. Weinberg, PC, Boston, MA, Roy Black, Jacqueline L. Perczek, Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf, PA, Miami, FL, Jay P. Lefkowitz, Kirk- land & Ellis, LLP, New York, NY, for Intervenors-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Flor-

Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf, PA, Miami, FL, Jay P. Lefkowitz, Kirk- land & Ellis, LLP, New York, NY, for Inter

l. Most Cited Cases The court of appeals reviews de novo whether it has jurisdiction to decide an O 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. EFTA00209806 Page 2 749 F.3d 999, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1270 (Cite as: 749 F.3d 999) interlocutory appeal. [2] Federal Courts 170B 13598(1

olding adjudication or sentencing, and probation or community control in lieu of imprisonment." I have more than a dozen e-mails between myself and Jay Lefkowitz discussing the U.S. Attorney's insistence on eighteen months of incarceration. You will recall that at one meeting you and Ms. Sanchez raised the id

more than a dozen e-mails between myself and Jay Lefkowitz discussing the U.S. Attorney's insistence on eigh

ecessary incidental expenses of the prisoner. 3. Support of the prisoner's legal dependents. O 2008 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. httn://web2.westlaw.cominrintinrintstream nsnx?nrfl=f4TIVII.PArifm=NntRetb.rlectinatinn 11 nannnsz EFTA00223170 Page 3 of 8 West's F.S.A. § 95

olding adjudication or sentencing, and probation or community control in lieu of imprisonment." I have more than a dozen e-mails between myself and Jay Lefkowitz discussing the U.S. Attorney's insistence on eighteen months of incarceration. You will recall that at one meeting you and Ms. Sanchez raised the id

ust 26, 2008 DELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP Citigroup Center 15

Fla.1988)). This presumption rests on the most fundamental values of American government. (ID 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. EFTA00183646 Not Reported in So.2d Not Reported in So.2d, 1994 WL 741009 (Fla.Cir.Ct.), 22 Media L. Rep. 2497 (Cite as: 1994 WL 741009 (Fla.Cir

olding adjudication or sentencing, and probation or community control in lieu of imprisonment." I have more than a dozen e-mails between myself and Jay Leflcowitz discussing the U.S. Attorney's insistence on eighteen months of incarceration. You will recall that at one meeting you and Ms. Sanchez raised the id

ecessary incidental expenses of the prisoner. 3. Support of the prisoner's legal dependents. O 2008 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. httn://web2.westlaw.com/nrint/nrintstream.aAnx?nrft=1-ITMT fm=1\IntSetAr rl ect lent nn 11 adnnnR EFTA00192646 Page 3 of 8 West's F.S.A. § 95