Epstein Secrets

it utterly fails to demonStrate 1 t t • Government theory supports what at its essence is a federalization of underage prostitution {see letter to Lelkowitz of December 13. 2007 al lig 4, per I). This is compellingly sx) kir several reasons: • Absent testimony, the evidence does not exclude the possibi

stal Service. Thank you. EFTA01718527 • U.S. Departinent of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Jay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. Kirkland & Ellis LLP New York, New York 10022-4675 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jay: Miami, FL 33132-2111 Facsimile: December 6, 2007 I wr

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET DATE: December 6, 2007 TO: Jay Leflcowitz, Esquire FAX NUMBER: SUBJECT: Epstein NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING THIS PAGE: 9 @001. EFTA01718526 U.S. Department of Justice United States At

be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement.") (emphasis added); Cleveland v. United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence ... that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive." ).r Under these standards, the

tion of Resolution of Epstein Investigation; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 10

e counsel: the Agreement and the addendum thereto; the USAO's letter of Crime Victims' Rights —Notification of Resolution of Epstein Investigation; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 10, 2007; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 23, 2007; R. Alexander Acosta's l

t be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement") (emphasis added)• Cleveland v, United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive.").2 Under these standards, there i

ffrey Epstein, Faces Increased Calls To Resign," reports that the Miami Herald has revealed that Acosta "made a deal with Washington, D.C. attorney Jay Lefkowitz, his former colleague, at a breakfast meeting in October 2007," which "closed an FBI probe into whether there were more victims, granted immunity to

"made a deal with Washington, D.C. attorney Jay Lefkowitz, his former colleague, at a breakfast meeting in

• DC Prosecutor Blamed Nonexistent Crime Lab Backlog For Delays. LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES • FBI Working To Protect Fans During MLB All-Star Game In Cleveland. • Detroit Surveillance Camera System Faces New Scrutiny From Residents. • Former Inmate Who Earned College Degree Via Second Chance Pell Profiled.

tion of Resolution of Epstein Investigation; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 10

e counsel: the Agreement and the addendum thereto; the USAO's letter of Crime Victims' Rights —Notification of Resolution of Epstein Investigation; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alexander Acosta dated October 10, 2007; Jay Lefkowitz's letter to R. Alcor Acosta dated October 23, 2007; R. Alexander Acosta's lett

t be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement") (emphasis added)• Cleveland United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive.").2 Under these standards, there is

the authority, and his consent, to make any determination it deems appropriate regarding this matter, including to decline federal prosecution. 2 Jay Lefkowitz has personally reviewed the reporter's contemporaneous notes. EFTA00310840 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Honorable ■ May 14, 2008 Page 4 As you know, I

ncluding to decline federal prosecution. 2 Jay Lefkowitz has personally reviewed the reporter's contempora

tates, 242 U.S. 470 (1917). The statute's primary purpose was to address the so-called commercial case of transporting females for immoral purposes. Cleveland v. United States, 329 U.S. 14 (1946) (even though the Act includes some non-commercial cases within its scope, its primary focus is commercial sexu

the wealthy financier. The other lawyer, Jay P. Lefkowitz, helped secure [the previous deal]. The split na

ment reviews of Epstein's case, because another lawyer at his then-firm, Kirkland & Ellis, had represented the wealthy financier. The other lawyer, Jay P. Lefkowitz, helped secure [the previous deal]. The split nature of Barr's recusal suggests that federal prosecutors in New York — who unsealed new sex traffic

he was paid $371,159 in 2017 and $405,368 in 2018." Shane Bieber of the Indians pitches for the American League last night at Progressive Field in Cleveland. (Jason Miller/Getty Images) -- On the strength of its pitchers, the American League will get home-field advantage in the World Series after a 4-3

ment reviews of Epstein's case, because another lawyer at his then-firm, Kirkland & Ellis, had represented the wealthy financier. The other lawyer, Jay P. Lefkowitz, helped secure [the previous deal]. The split nature of Barr's recusal suggests that federal prosecutors in New York — who unsealed new sex traffic

the wealthy financier. The other lawyer, Jay P. Lefkowitz, helped secure [the previous deal]. The split nat

he was paid $371,159 in 2017 and $405,368 in 2018." Shane Bieber of the Indians pitches for the American League last night at Progressive Field in Cleveland. (Jason Miller/Getty Images) -- On the strength of its pitchers, the American League will get home-field advantage in the World Series after a 4-3

zgaiirkiend.coi cc Subject RE: Meeting A. Marie Villcialla Assistant U.S. Attorney — Ori From: \(USAFLS\)" Sent: 09/19/2007 11:51 AM AST To: Jay Leflcowitz Subject: Meeting Barry is available Monday morning. Our most flexible West Palm Beach magistrate is on duty on Monday, so, assuming we have signe

ey Epstein - con I ential (USAFLS) Dear Mr. Jay Lefkowitz [[email protected]] (USAFLS) I write to

T]he only factual issue in the case was whether paitioners dominant purpose in making the trip was to facilitate her practice of prostitution. . .); Cleveland I United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence .. . that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive."). There is no basis for conc