Epstein Secrets

Sloman regarding inquiries from State Attorney's Office regarding Epstein plea to state charge and facts supporting state plea 12/21/2007 11. Al Acostaer exand Jay Lefkowitz Knowledge of "list" of alleged victims is limited. Proposal deprives Epstein of his opportunity to test the validity of these

e handling of the investigation by the State Attorney's Office 1/3/2008 I :.mails between Marie Villafatia, Alex Acosta, and Jeff Sloman regarding Alex Acosta telephone conference with Jay Lefkowitz where Lefkowitz admitted that he never intended to have Epstein plead guilty to an offense that required se

ttorneys also falsely accused FAUSA Sloman (and me) of promising money to a victim in exchange for her willingness to accuse Epstein. U.S. Aftorney R. Alexander Acosta (now Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor): USA Acosta served as the head of the U.S. Attorney's Office throughout the investigation of Jeffre

BI): ASAC Parlave supervised GS Ortiz. She attended the July 26, 2007 meeting where Criminal Chief Menchel announced the two-year plea offer. S/A Pryor: S/A Pryor participated in the interview of in Australia. S/A Gavin Gumbiner (still at FBI): S/A Gumbiner was the case agent on Operation Stolen

cute Epstein, maintaining he committed no federal crimes. However, following a September 7, 2007 meeting with Epstein's defense team, U.S. Attorney Alexander R. Acosta" notified Epstein's team that "our Office [has] decided to proceed with the indictment." 3 Despite this statement, the former U.S. Attorney subseque

ediate" threat of future CVRA violations. Id. at 1328. Third, the court rejected Ms. Wild's requests for a victim-impact hearing and a meeting with Acosta on the grounds that it lacked jurisdiction over Acosta, that she had already had the opportunity to participate in an Epstein- related hearing in N

interpretation of the remedy provision in *1316 § 377I(d), which refers back to those § 3771(a) rights. Indeed, both the Majority and Chief Judge Pryor's concurrence examine the CVRA as a whole and look to various subsections of the CVRA to support their conclusion that § 377I(d) does not grant Ms.

ed States was prepared to name in an indictment. SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. Dated: BRADLEY EDWARDS, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiffs Jane Does #1 & 2 R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Dated: By: ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY DEXTER LEE Attorney for Defendant United States -5- EFTA00191289 Case 9:08-cv-

ney for Plaintiffs Jane Does #1 & 2 R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Dated: By: ASSISTANT

e its protection because he entered a guilty plea and the victims intend to use the correspondence against the United States, not against Epstein," Pryor wrote. He was joined in the unanimous decision by Judge Beverly Martin and U.S. District Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell of Orlando, sitting by de

ef Reite took the extraordinary ste prosecutor's office. At the time, the federal Florida was a Republican Reiter recalls being presen and remembers Acosta’s dec be the prosecution, to the who takes advantage of th sex crimes. Disgusted with I recalls thinking he’d found | In Acosta, the chief saw from

ith no intent tc CHAPT = would have resulted in 1 register as a sexual offer underage victims. Local police were dis 4 q ney’s conclusions, and re R. Alexander Acosta’s letter to the general public, Federal authorities recei M h 20. 2011 a engaged in additional inve arc 3 7 the quality of the evidenc: at trial. Wit

day. “During the meeting, Rodriguez produced a small bound book and several sheets of legal pad paper containing handwrit- ten notes,” Special Agent Pryor would say in her statement. She continues: Rodriguez explained that he had taken the bound book from his former employer’s residence while employed

Bradshaw wants conjugal. But even US attorney Aco: agreement with the governmi ment was highly irregular. “Epstein appears to have while in jail,” Acosta would . eral public. “Although the tei are a matter appropriately lef eral authorities, without dot while in state custody under And, of course, Ep

hose individuals are not the ones who at the time reviewed the evidence available for trial and assessed the likelihood of success. - Respectfully, R. Alexander Acosta Former U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022020 --- PAGE BREAK --- PATTERSON y about his crimes because vic- ) speak ou

day. “During the meeting, Rodriguez produced a small bound book and several sheets of legal pad paper containing handwrit- ten notes,” Special Agent Pryor would say in her statement. She continues: Rodriguez explained that he had taken the bound book from his former employer’s residence while employed