Epstein Secrets

ment and Addendum Pending Review". DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Palm Bea ounty, Florida this --os day of June, 2009. Copies furnished: R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney's Office - Southern District 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Barbara Burns, Esq., State Attorney's

y of June, 2009. Copies furnished: R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney's Office - Southern District 500

9 So.2d 389, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 So.2d 389) custody proceeding are not considered as "necessary parties" to the action. See Shienvold v. Habit:, 622 So.2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). There- fore, it is manifestly obvious that the minor chil- dren in this case are not "parties" to this

Y that a true and correct copy of the foiegoing has been flunishad '. :II I. . , • I. .., ! ' .,. : ' " 17 t 'via fet‘mileabe U.S. Mail to:. R. Alexander Acosta; United StatcrAttoracY'i Office _Southern qh . . . .. •••• : i Thstn • . .. ; . • . :. .., '.' 1• : . ci, 500 S. Australian Ave., Ste. 400, c

17 t 'via fet‘mileabe U.S. Mail to:. R. Alexander Acosta; United StatcrAttoracY'i Office _Southern qh . .

9 769 .2d 389d4 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 M.2d 389) custody proceeding are not considered as "necessary arties" to the action. See Shienvold v. liable, 622 e2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). There- fore, it is manifestly obvious that the minor chil- dren in this case are not "parties" to this p

OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished via o U.S. Mail; K Facsimile; a Overnight Delivery to R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney's Office-Southern District, 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, Judith Stevenson Areo, Esq., Stat

i Nials4IntileTaixt U.S. Mail to; R. Ainstneter Acosta; United StatesAtIhnt&s Oiglet ;•Soulhorn • !I l

9 So.2d 389, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 So.2d 389) custody proceeding are not considered as "necessary parties" to the action. See Shienvold v. liable. 622 So.2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). There- fore, it is manifestly obvious that the minor chil- dren in this case are not "parties" to this