Epstein Secrets

se's word for=it. The potential consequences are of course the =ost important thing insofar as any consequence directly affects you (actio= against Acosta etc. not really your problem). But the separate and =elated issue is what if anything to do about the fact that the complete st=ry you have describe

From: 1 <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2019 1:47 AM To: DAVID SCHOEN Subject: Re: feeling was not to encourage marra to do what he did witho=t any encouragment . yes i am also a worst case proponent. i dont think i

ors -- including current Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta -- viola=ed federal law when they reached a plea

From: DAVID SCHOEN Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 12:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: From Fox News - Prosecutors broke law by not informing victims of J

r and as being friends=with another informant, Nadler. I assume they don't realize they are undercutting their friend in the White House as well Re: Acosta and the P=ez himself. I ordinarily would not send a whacko site but this one gets a l=t of play. https://teapartypac.org/muellers-star-witness-agai

From: DAVID SCHOEN Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 12:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Mueller's Star Witness Against Trump Once Arrested For Child Porn, Hun

2? On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 6:39 AM < > wrote: Oh man, I was hoping it would be a piece foc=sing on Tatum and some real facts. DC loves focus on Acosta I guess a=d to hurt him loves to make you look as bad as possible without caring abou= the real facts. Can talk between 1 and 3:30 and then after 7

From: DAVID SCHOEN Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2019 11:55 AM To: Subject: Re: Status Sou=ds good. On Mar 17, 2019, at 6=48 AM, 1 <[email protected]» wrote: <m

< wrote: Other than the obvious political angle Acosta/Trump, why is 100% o= the focus on the federal NP

From: DAVID SCHOEN <S Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 3:17 PM To: Subject: Re: Question Not=much. But something. Who gave it, what questions, etc. wr=tten report? C