From: 1 <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2019 1:47 AM To: DAVID SCHOEN Subject: Re: feeling was not to encourage marra to do what he did witho=t any encouragment . yes i am also a worst case proponent. i dont think i can win the pr battle and must concentrate on =ny possible legal consequence. On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 8:40 PM D=VID SCHOEN < On the one hand it is absurd. On the other hand it is =otentially a very serious situation. I would need to do some researc= to know just how serious the consequences realistically might be. <=iv> I have read in the paper that one possible remedy plaint=ffs intend to seek is the nullification of the "illegal" a=reement and the prosecution of a number of cases against you. There =ould seem to be a whole host of impediments to any such radical and outrag=ous course of action like that both of a legal and equitable nature. =However, I am a worst case scenario person ALWAYS and do not think a crimi=al defense lawyer every should be anything but that. <=iv>Perhaps you have done the research already or have counsel who has and =eel you have a sense of exactly what the worst case scenario is. I d=n't know; but I also would not take anyone else's word for=it. The potential consequences are of course the =ost important thing insofar as any consequence directly affects you (actio= against Acosta etc. not really your problem). But the separate and =elated issue is what if anything to do about the fact that the complete st=ry you have described in the prospective op-Ed drafts you have sent to me =as never come out - nor has anything that in any way challenges the popula= rendition and characterization of you as predator, monster, etc. </=iv> And as you correctly anticipated some t=me ago, that is a real problem and has perhaps been part of what has led t= this snowballing with no pushback of any kind (notwithstanding all the ho= shot lawyers you had by your side all through the deal and after - where =re they now?). Without seeing the papers in the c=se now before judge Marra I don't feel like I can give any meaning=ul advice on either the legal or pr front. But I do know that you ne=d some good advice now and moving forward. David<=r> please note The information containe= in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileg=d, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the u=e of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disc=osure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly =rohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this EFTA_R1_01858336 EFTA02633960

communicati=n in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail =o jeevacation@g=ail.com <[email protected]>, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, =ncluding all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved </=iv> =br> please note The information conta=ned in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privi=eged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for th= use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, d=sclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strict=y prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communic=tion in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-ma=l to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereotar>including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved --000000000000fba451058299fef5-- conversation-id 336675 date-last-viewed 0 date-received 1550972802 flags 8590195713 remote-id 903426 2 EFTA_R1_01858337 EFTA02633961