Epstein Secrets

Quiz 013/013 et 00U Honorable Mark Filip May 19. 2008 Page 8 prosecution is fair and appropriate has been placed, once again, in U.S. Attorney Acosta's hands. in light of the foregoing, we respectfully ask that you review this matter and discontinue all federal involvement so that the State cam

rights of our client, are at issue. Recently, the Criminal Division concluded a very limited review of this matter tit the request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. Critically, however, this review deliberately excluded many important aspects of this ease. Just this past Friday, on May 16, 2008, we received a t

SUFI, offered, in my opinion, numerous and various reasonable modifications and accommodations which ultimately resulted in United States Attorney R. Alexander Acosta's' December 19, 2007 letter to Lilly Ann Sanchez. In that letter, the United States Attorney tried to eliminate all concerns which, quite frankly, the

lephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #15. (147) On or about April 1, 2005, one of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's employees prepared a note for Defendan FFREY EPSTEIN's review that read: "10:30 [Jane Doe #15]/[Jane Doe #10] on Fri around 2'Oclock". (148) In or around June 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EP

rk Product EXHIBIT B-123 EFTA00224636 Division hi f o the Criminal Division , First Assistant United States Attorney , United States Attorney R. Alexander Acosta as well as various members of the Child Exploitation e i Sectio (CEOS) at the Department of Justice including, but not limited to its Chief, . M

nal Division Chief, First Assistant USA the SDFL to become AG Fi her's Chief of Staffs Above Mr. in the SDK's chain of and finally, U.S. Attorney Acosta. Prior to seeking approval to return an indictment, Epstein's legal team had been actively working to convince this Office that such action was not

On or about July 15, 2004, DefendantIMEMS placed one or niorii telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #9. (67) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendan caused Jane Doe #9 to make one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #10. (68) On or about July 17, 2004, Defendant telephone c

pectively of Lot 40, containing 0.07 acres, more or less. Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1594(b). ATIJE AFT FOREPERSON DRAFT R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DRAFT ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 53 EFTA01703107

4(b). ATIJE AFT FOREPERSON DRAFT R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DRAFT ASSISTANT UNITED

venteen-year-old girl, how old she was. CYD*Ci cal s. 4 war /7 (132) In or around the first nine months of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN with Defendan in the v „.. presence of Jane Doe #17, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. (133) In or around the first nine months of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY

Y that a true and correct copy of the foiegoing has been flunishad '. :II I. . , • I. .., ! ' .,. : ' " 17 t 'via fet‘mileabe U.S. Mail to:. R. Alexander Acosta; United StatcrAttoracY'i Office _Southern qh . . . .. •••• : i Thstn • . .. ; . • . :. .., '.' 1• : . ci, 500 S. Australian Ave., Ste. 400, c

17 t 'via fet‘mileabe U.S. Mail to:. R. Alexander Acosta; United StatcrAttoracY'i Office _Southern qh . .

urth District would reverse ling since the proper procedures for sealing the NPA were never followed. As to likelihood of harm, the only reference Defendan to this issue is in paragraph 3 of his motion. Here, Defendant merely m mad assertion that there will be "irreparable harm caused by the disclosu

OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished via o U.S. Mail; K Facsimile; a Overnight Delivery to R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney's Office-Southern District, 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, Judith Stevenson Areo, Esq., Stat

i Nials4IntileTaixt U.S. Mail to; R. Ainstneter Acosta; United StatesAtIhnt&s Oiglet ;•Soulhorn • !I l

urth District would reverse ling since the proper procedures for sealing the NPA were never followed. As to likelihood of harm, the only reference Defendan to this issue is in paragraph 3 of his motion. Here, Defendant merely ad assertion that there will be "irreparable harm caused by the disclosure

ence with his sentence, and, most significantly, allow the victims to move forward with their lives. We are in process of scheduling a meeting with R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney, to further discuss this matter. Sincerely, cc. R. Alexander Acosta Gerald Lefcourt Roy Black caltikingi-MittiVVIARRA

process of scheduling a meeting with R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney, to further discuss this

In or around 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of $200 to Jane Doe #2, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. (16) In or around 2003, Defendan placed a telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #2 to make an appointment for Jane Doe #2 to travel to 358 El Brillo Way. (17) On or abou

Memorandum Subject Re: Operation Leap Year Date May 1, 2007 To R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeff Sloman, First Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division MAUSA, Northern Region Chief, Northern Regio

on Leap Year Date May 1, 2007 To R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeff Sloman, First Assis

he masturbated. 8 EFTA02857682 (5) In or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of $300 to Jane Doe #2. (6) In or around 2001, Defendan placed a telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #2 to make an appointment for Jane Doe #2 to travel to 358 El Brillo Way. (7) In or arou