Epstein Secrets

ments regarding Epstein were not lost on his attorneys. A December 21, 2007 letter from Jay Lefkowitz, one of Epstein's attorneys, to U.S. Attorney Acosta, devoted two pages examining Jane Doe No. 2's interview testimony on April 24, 2007. Ex. D at 9-15. 4 EFTA00211721 significant because, "[i]t is

RTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. INTRODUCTION Petitioners contend the government violated their rights under the Crime Victi

ents regarding Epstein were not lost on his attorneys. A December 21, 2007 letter from Jay Leflcowitz, one of Epstein's attorneys, to U.S. Attorney Acosta, devoted two pages examining Jane Doe No. 2's interview testimony on April 24, 2007. Ex. D at 9-15. 4 EFTA00799828 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Docume

RTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. INTRODUCTION Petitioners contend the Government violated their rights under the Crime Victi

ments regarding Epstein were not lost on his attorneys. A December 21, 2007 letter from Jay Lefkowitz, one of Epstein's attorneys, to U.S. Attorney Acosta, devoted two pages examining Jane Doe No. 2's interview testimony on April 24, 2007. Ex. D at 9-15. 4 EFTA00591465 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Docume

RTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment, and states: I. INTRODUCTION Petitioners contend the Government violated their rights under the Crime Victi