Epstein Secrets

buy some weed!!! . can't wait!!! . . . (I told on: RFP MIA 000453 EFTA00208934 12/11/2007 11:40 FAX a 01 4 / 0 98 • • KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP R. Alexander Acosta Di:ember I I, 2007 Page 11 let me say that again) I can't wait to buy some weedn I also want to get a vaporizer so I can smoke in my room because ap

you and your client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the Office to c

rights of our client, are at issue. Recently, the Criminal Division concluded a very limited review of this matter at the request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. Critically, however, this review deliberately excluded many important aspects of this case Just this past Friday, on May 16, 2008, we received a le

hing the relevant federal statutes beyond recognition, and that federal involvement in this mutter should be precluded butt on federalism concerns, the Petite Policy, and general principles of prosecutorial disattion, the panics corn • discussions of a possible plea agreement. Around this time, we received an e

AWS:14.$4. Caldwria 90017 xnnnum W Stan I u Call Miler Direct ty 171316W-8440 ktlarrOlutklietti cam VIA 17At IMI1.17 30a 5;i0-6444 I lonorable R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4111Stnan Miami, FL 33132 Rc Jeffrey Epstein Dear A

IMI1.17 30a 5;i0-6444 I lonorable R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's

ng the relevant federal statutes beyond recognition, and that federal involvement in this matter should he precluded basest on federalism concerns, the Petite Policy, and general principles of prosecutorial discretion. the parties commenced discussions of a possible plea agreement. Around this time. we received a

physical contact involving sexual thoughts ouldlot desires with another permte. EFTA01718647 12/11/2007 11:39 FAX e011/099 KIRKLAND & ELLIS us R. Alexander Acosta Da:ember 11.2007 Page 8 a. Broken "Sex Toss" in Mr. Epstein's Trash. The Police Report details the police finding in Mr. Epstein's trash what is des

you and your client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and Sloman, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the Offi

ing the relevant federal statutes beyond recognition, and that federal involvement in this matter should be precluded based on federalism concerns. the Petite Policy, and general principles or prosecutorial discretion. the parties commenced discussions an possible pica agreement. Around this time, we received an

h lines respectively of Lot 40, containing 0.07 acres, more or Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1594(b). A TRUE BILL. FOREPERSON R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY A. VILLAFARA ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 54 EFTA00225786 (e) difficulty; has been commingled with other propert

would amount to what would be seen by the public as "mansion arrest". Such reasoning had no bearing on the Petite analysis and clearly violated Mr. Acosta's stated policy of horizontal equality. Treating Mr. Epstein differently from any other similarly charged individual simply because of his wealth di

federal prosecutors were taking in order to circumvent its restrictions. Mr. Menchel's articulation of the purported federal interest misrepresents the Petite Policy on two grounds. First, Mr. Menchel's position that the federal interest could not be vindicated in the absence of a jail term for Mr. Epstein is co