hing the relevant federal statutes beyond recognition, and that federal involvement in this mutter should be precluded butt on federalism concerns, the Petite Policy, and general principles of prosecutorial disattion, the panics corn • discussions of a possible plea agreement. Around this time, we received an e

ng the relevant federal statutes beyond recognition, and that federal involvement in this matter should he precluded basest on federalism concerns, the Petite Policy, and general principles of prosecutorial discretion. the parties commenced discussions of a possible plea agreement. Around this time. we received a

cutors violated the authority of state and local governments, overthrowing principles of comity, contravening the "clear statement rule" as well as the Petite Policy, and undermining a comprehensive state investigation and resolution of the case. As a result of the unwarranted interference of federal prosecutors

cutors violated the authority of state and local governments, overthrowing principles of comity, contravening the "clear statement rule" as well as the Petite Policy, and undermining a comprehensive state investigation and resolution of the case. As a result of the unwarranted interference of federal prosecutors

ing the relevant federal statutes beyond recognition, and that federal involvement in this matter should be precluded based on federalism concerns. the Petite Policy, and general principles or prosecutorial discretion. the parties commenced discussions an possible pica agreement. Around this time, we received an

federal prosecutors were taking in order to circumvent its restrictions. Mr. Menchel's articulation of the purported federal interest misrepresents the Petite Policy on two grounds. First, Mr. Menchel's position that the federal interest could not be vindicated in the absence of a jail term for Mr. Epstein is co