Epstein Secrets

ce from your office is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that a violation o

litigate, see, e.g., letters from Jay Lefkowitz to Black. Srebnick. Korrtspan & Stumpf. P.A. EFTA00722001 Jeff Sloman . March 5, 2010 Page 4 Alex Acosta October 10, 2007, p.4 and November 29, 2007, p.2. Again, we are only requesting that you inform us whether in the event Mr. Epstein did not contest

ffrey Epstein Dear Counsel: JESSICA FONSECA•NADER KATHLEEN P. PHILLIPS AARON ANTHON MARCOS BEATON, JR. NIArmEw P. O'BRIEN JENIFER J. SOULSOAS NOAH Fox Assistant United States Attorney 99 N.E. 41° Street Miami, FL 33132 We write this letter to renew our request that the United States Attorney's

ce from your office is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that g violation o

fkowitz to Mack. Srebnick. Komspan & Stumpf. P.A. EFTA00213281 Jeff Sloman, Esq. Bob Senior, Esq. Marie Villafana, Esq. March 5, 2010 Page 4 Alex Acosta October 10, 2007, p.4 and November 29, 2007, p.2. Again, we are only requesting that you inform us whether in the event Mr. Epstein did not contest

rey Epstein Dear Counsel: JESSIC.A ForisEC-A-NADER ICATEazur P. PHILLIPS AARON AMMON MARCOS BEATON, JR. MATTHEW P. OBRIEN JEPHPER J. SOUUKULS NOAH Fox RINactigRoyillockeogn Assistant United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 We write this letter to renew our request that the Uni

ce from your office is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that g violation o

fkowitz to Mack. Srebnick. Komspan & Stumpf. P.A. EFTA00189957 Jeff Sloman, Esq. Bob Senior, Esq. Marie Villafana, Esq. March 5, 2010 Page 4 Alex Acosta October 10, 2007, p.4 and November 29, 2007, p.2. Again, we are only requesting that you inform us whether in the event Mr. Epstein did not contest

rey Epstein Dear Counsel: JESSIC.A ForisEC-A-NADER ICATEazur P. PHILLIPS AARON AMMON MARCOS BEATON, JR. MATTHEW P. OBRIEN JEPHPER J. SOUUKULS NOAH Fox RINactigRoyillockeogn Esq. Assistant United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 We write this letter to renew our request that t

and comply with the letter and spirit of the NPA. As to the third item, we have reviewed your letter to Mr. Sloman of February 8, 2010. While Mr. Acosta did state in his letter of December 19, 2007, that he did not believe that the Office was EFTA00194762 ROY BLACK, ESQ. FEBRUARY 11, 2010 PAGE 2

kowitz to Black. Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A EFTA00194768 Jeff Sloman, Esq. Bob Senior, Esq. Marie Villafana, Esq. March 5, 2010 Page 4 Alex Acosta October 10, 2007, p.4 and November 29, 2007, p.2. Again, we are only requesting that you inform us whether in the event Mr. Epstein did not contest

Jeffrey Epstein Dear Counsel: JESSICA FONSECA-NADER Woman P. PHILLIPS AARON ANThON MARCOS BEATON, JR. MATTHEW P. O'BRIEN JENIPER J. SOULIKIAS NOAH Fox RalocklaRoyalackeom A. Marie Villafana, Esq. Assistant United States Attorney 500 South Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6223 Jeffrey