Epstein Secrets

ofEpstein’s lawyers, the indictment was never presented to a federal grand jury. 25. Instead, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District ofFlorida, Alexander Acosta, negotiated a plea deal with Epstein’s team of lawyers to grant immunity to Epstein (along with four named co-conspirators and any unnamed potential

LERK. 3/27/2023 2:57:43 PM On information and belief, based on public records, former State Attorney Krischer communicated with then U.S. Attorney Acosta concerning the NPA’s negotiation with Epstein’s lawyers. 29. Indeed, Epstein was not incarcerated in a Florida prison for the State crimes for which

e told to be patient’ while the investigation proceeded.” By then, it was too late. A deal had already been cut with then-South Florida U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta and Epstein’s attorneys to shelve a. 52-page federal indictment against Epstein, a former math teacher turned money manager who counts Presidents Don

isclosure “will be the product of their own conduct, and not the consequence of an unrestrained body of misguided citizens.” Miami Herald Pub. Co. v. Marko, 352 So. 2d 518 (1977) (“The benefits to be derived from this extraordinary exercise in citizen participation [in the grand jury] would be severely l

Epstein's lawyers, the indictment was never presented to a feder~l grand jury. 25. Instead, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Alexander Acosta, negotiated a plea deal with Epstein's team of lawyers to grant immunity to Epstein (along with four named co-conspirators and any unnamed potentia

LERK. 3/27/2023 2:57:43 PM On information and belief, based on public records, former State Attorney Krischer communicated with then U.S. Attorney Acosta concerning the NPA’s negotiation with Epstein’s lawyers. 29. Indeed, Epstein was not incarcerated in a Florida prison for the State crimes for which

isclosure “will be the product of their own conduct, and not the consequence of an unrestrained body of misguided citizens.” Miami Herald Pub. Co. v. Marko, 352 So. 2d 518 (1977) (“The benefits to be derived from this extraordinary exercise in citizen participation [in the grand jury] would be severely l

EPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3Y27/2023 4:10:49 PM I 27. When the FBI commenced its own investigation, then-U.S. Attorney for the Southern District ofFlorida, Alexander Acosta, asked First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman whether it was “appropriate to approach [State Attorney Krischer] and give him a heads up re wher

l be leakedstraight to Epstein.” i Appendix at 3 (OPR Report, p. 21). 5. The Infamous Non-Prosecution Agreement: “Please Tell Me You Are Joking.” 28. Acosta was well aware that the PBPD brought the case to the FBI’s attention because of a concern that the State Attorney’s Office had succumbed to “pressure

isclosure] will be the product of their own conduct, and hot the consequence of ah unrestrained body of misguided citizens.” Miami Herald Pub. Co. v. Marko, 352 So.2d 518, 523 (Fla. 1977). The decision in Marko emphasized that a grand jury’s important role in “exposing] official misconduct” precludes res

bsidiaries of UBS Financial Services It Imegnum, nsurance. and army products: Not FDIC mind • No bank guwantem May lose value RMA khan Manage nest Acosta. Business Services Amami 95.4,, AMA ad nternaziecol Resource Management Accost are registered service marts of UBS Mamie Services tic Visa Signnu

ith titled banks and other thrd-paty bats and wow* access to nsuance and annul), Proctet issued by wall/feed thrd.pany insurance companies through Marko agency subsidiaries of UBSFitancial Services W. IMeStrnent, rOuranCe and arrurty products: Not FDIC raved • No tuk gusset* May lose vibe RhIA Res