Epstein Secrets

avenues have now been shut donna. Mr. Shuman's letter purports to prohibit any further cantata between Mr. lipskirrk defense learn and U.S. Attorney Acosta. and instead requires us to communicate with the IJSAO only though Mr. Sloman's subordinatcx. While it pains us to say this, this misguided proscou

rights of our client, are at issue. Recently. the Criminal Division concluded a very limited review of this matter at the request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. Critically, however, this review deliberately excluded many important aspects of this case. Just this past Friday, on May 16, 2008, We received a l

tors during the negotiations of a detbrred prosecution agreement. The consistent representations of key Government witnesses (such as Tatum Miller. Brittany Beale, Saige Gonzalez, and Jennifer Laduke) confirm the following critical points: rips!, there was no communication, telephonic or othcnvisc, that meets

ly, there was no force, coercion, fraud, violence, drugs, or even alcohol present in connection with Mr. Epstein's encounters with these women, Ms. Beale stated that "[Mr. Epstein] never tried to force me to do anything." Beale Tr. A at 12. These accounts are far from the usual testimony in sex slaver

Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) From: Jay Lefkowitz [email protected] Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 10,54 AM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Subject: confidenti

e SDFL offered, in my opinion, numerous and various reasonable modifications and accommodations which ultimately resulted in United States Attorney R. Alexander Acosta's December 19, 2007 letter to Lilly Ann Sanchez. In that letter, the United States Attorney tried to eliminate all concerns which, quite frankly, the

y points: First, there was no telephonic communication that met the requirements of § 2422(b). For example, as many other witnesses have stated, Ms. Beale testified in no unclear terms that there was never any discussion over the phone about her coming over to Mr. Epstein's home to engage in sexual ac

rights of our client, arc at issue. Recently, the Criminal Division concluded a very limited review of this matter at the request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. Critically, however, this review deliberately excluded many important aspects of this case. Just this past Friday, on May 16, 2008, we received a l

IVE OFFICE UAG I atil.A6oart s Qhoos 4Doonots toun3 Honorable Mark Pilip May 19, 2008 Page 2 fly way of background. we were informed by Mr. Acosta chat, at his request, CEOS would be conducting a review to determine whether federal prosecution was both appropriate and, in his words. That is n

ly, there was no force, coercion, fraud, violence, drugs, or even alcohol present in connection with Mr. Epstein's encounters with these women, Ms. Beale stated that "[Mr. Epstein) never tried to force me to du anything." Tr. A et 12. These accounts are far from the usual testimony in sex slavery, In

n May 19 15:37:30 2008 Subject: RE: confidential communication From: Original Message , III C. (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 3:37 PM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Subject: Re: confidential communication ) ; Original Message From: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) To: (USAFLS); Campos, Cyndee (USAF

8-80736-CV MARRA 002196 EFTA00227310 communication that met the requirements of § 2422(b). For example, as many other witnesses have stated, Ms. Beale testified in no unclear terms that there was never any discussion over the phone about her coming over to Mr. Epstein's home to engage in sexual ac

30 2008 Subject: RE: confidential communication Original Message From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 3:37 PM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: Re: confidential communication Original Message From: Acosta, Alex (U

was no telephonic 1027 EFTA00227156 communication that met the requirements of § 2422(b). For example, as many other witnesses have stated, Ms. Beale testified in no unclear terms that there was never any discussion over the phone about her coming over to Mr. Epstein's home to engage in sexual ac

rights of our client, are at issue. Recently, the Criminal Division concluded a very limited review of this matter at the ' request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. Critically, however, this review deliberately excluded many important aspects of this case. Just this past Friday, on May 16, 2008, we received a le

below. A001438 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025353 --- PAGE BREAK --- Honorable Mark Filip May 19, 2008 Page 2 By way of background, we were informed by Mr. Acosta that, at his request, CEOS would be conducting a review to determine whether federal prosecution was both appropriate and, in his words, “fair.” That

cutors during the negotiations of a deferred prosecution agreement. The consistent representations of key Government witnesses (such as Tatum Miller, Brittany Beale, Saige Gonzalez, and Jennifer Laduke) confirm the following critical points: First, there was no communication, telephonic or otherwise, that meets t

ally, there was no force, coercion, fraud, violence, drugs, or even alcohol present in connection with Mr. Epstein’s encounters with these women. Ms. Beale stated that “[Mr. Epstein] never tried to force me to do anything.” Beale Tr. A at 12. These accounts are far from the usual testimony in sex slavery