Epstein Secrets

Quiz 013/013 et 00U Honorable Mark Filip May 19. 2008 Page 8 prosecution is fair and appropriate has been placed, once again, in U.S. Attorney Acosta's hands. in light of the foregoing, we respectfully ask that you review this matter and discontinue all federal involvement so that the State cam

rights of our client, are at issue. Recently, the Criminal Division concluded a very limited review of this matter tit the request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. Critically, however, this review deliberately excluded many important aspects of this ease. Just this past Friday, on May 16, 2008, we received a t

SUFI, offered, in my opinion, numerous and various reasonable modifications and accommodations which ultimately resulted in United States Attorney R. Alexander Acosta's' December 19, 2007 letter to Lilly Ann Sanchez. In that letter, the United States Attorney tried to eliminate all concerns which, quite frankly, the

ne without any ruspee4 an' (lie turmal rum:tip ll tt and scheduling of state judicial neuters. It require< den Mr. Ep stein's counsel persuade the Slate Attorney of l'alen peach tu issue a criminal in !brit union EFTA00225692 uoiuzive AWN 14:3a /AA 305 530 6440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE (moot U.S. Depart

EPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3Y27/2023 4:10:49 PM I 27. When the FBI commenced its own investigation, then-U.S. Attorney for the Southern District ofFlorida, Alexander Acosta, asked First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman whether it was “appropriate to approach [State Attorney Krischer] and give him a heads up re wher

l be leakedstraight to Epstein.” i Appendix at 3 (OPR Report, p. 21). 5. The Infamous Non-Prosecution Agreement: “Please Tell Me You Are Joking.” 28. Acosta was well aware that the PBPD brought the case to the FBI’s attention because of a concern that the State Attorney’s Office had succumbed to “pressure

U.S. at 756-57; Pittman, 267 F.3d at 1283; Richmond Newspapers, 448 U.S. at 596 (“the 5 No-knock warrants have been banned in Florida since 1994. See Slate y. Bamber, 630 So.2d 1048 (Fla. 1994). 6 While it is largely federal courts that have applied these nine factors, (1) there can be no dispute that Fl

AWS:14.$4. Caldwria 90017 xnnnum W Stan I u Call Miler Direct ty 171316W-8440 ktlarrOlutklietti cam VIA 17At IMI1.17 30a 5;i0-6444 I lonorable R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4111Stnan Miami, FL 33132 Rc Jeffrey Epstein Dear A

IMI1.17 30a 5;i0-6444 I lonorable R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's

request is fair and would not be unduly burdensome. II. THE IMPROPER IN VOI EM ENT AND CONDUCT OF FEDERAL AUTHORITIES. As established above, the Slate's charging decision. of one count of the solicitation of prostitution, was hardly irrational or irregular. Indeed, I ana Belohlavek. a Florida sex

WO. WM I I IMkIuI OM. MN Konnulh W. Slam to Coll WMOr ChrOdy. (213) 6111)-U4-10 leilautektrklond.com V lajtAOSIMILF: (30a.530-6444 I lonorable R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Re: Jeffrey Epstein INai

AOSIMILF: (30a.530-6444 I lonorable R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's

the Petite policy will be served by the Following procedure ... Epstein understands that the United Stales Attorney has no authority to require the Slate Attorney's Orrice to abide by any terms of this agreement. lipstein understands that it is his EFTA00176127 12/11/2007 11:42 FAX la019/099 KIRK

understanding between the United States and the defendant. There are no other agreements, promises, representations, or understandings. Date: By: R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Date: By: Date: By: JEFFREY EPSTEIN, DEFENDANT 8 EFTA00176618 GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT 9

ons, or understandings. Date: By: R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Date: By: Date:

fter the conclusion of his federal sentence and supervised release. 12. Theo de ant agrees f wvTal:/e all challenges to the Information by the Slate Attorney's Office and to waive the right to appeal his conviction and sentence in the state court. 13. The defendant agrees to provide to the U.S.

date and location of the interview. If you have anquestions or concerns about the proffer letter, you can reach me on my cell phone at Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta 111111111S Assistant United States Attorney Enclo cc: S/A Nesbitt Kuyrkendall EFTA01712664 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney

me on my cell phone at Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta 111111111S Assistant United States Attorney En

ed. GREETINGS: YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to be and appear before THE STATE ATTORNEY or his Assistant, in. and for Palm Beach County, Florida, at the Slate Attorney's Office, 401 North Dixie Highway, West Palm Beech, Florida. "INSTANTER for interrogation and the math to speak, in a certain thinks pendi

Directly VIA FACSIMII I Honorable R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney UUnited Stales Attorney'

n krinsactu Ma INK AMOK 717 Sonsh Figueroa Shoot Los Arthoint. Disliktiosa 90017 Knnnelh W Sian To call Wide, Directly VIA FACSIMII I Honorable R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney UUnited Stales Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th Street Miami. F1. 33132 Re: Jelfrcv &sack Dear

roposal we received From Ms. Villafana. that she has always seen solicitation of a minor as tx: appropriate charge under the facts Ilhis is also the Slate's recommended charge). What is now apparent is that she thought that solicitation of a minor MIS both a felony and a registerable charge under Flor

ERVICE 91 WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished via o U.S. Mail; K Facsimile; 0 Overnight Delivery to R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney's Office-Southern District, 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, Judith Stevenson Areo, Esq., Stat

K Facsimile; 0 Overnight Delivery to R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney's Office-Southern Distri

t= to I, • 1,..!.., I with sentencing. kit $Wita ilerald bune!..Div, • I I I I I :1 I ; " 2 , ; • tic t 1. . . Chief his faulted the Slate Attorney's : 1 3 4 , • .j : the Statb Attorney's disquidifloiSont Co. • • h. or! Sint! "40117:? ; ifsiu,t6pritro droonsi • ;;; ICS Ttiit4i0t

Y that a true and correct copy of the foiegoing has been flunishad '. :II I. . , • I. .., ! ' .,. : ' " 17 t 'via fet‘mileabe U.S. Mail to:. R. Alexander Acosta; United StatcrAttoracY'i Office _Southern qh . . . .. •••• : i Thstn • . .. ; . • . :. .., '.' 1• : . ci, 500 S. Australian Ave., Ste. 400, c

17 t 'via fet‘mileabe U.S. Mail to:. R. Alexander Acosta; United StatcrAttoracY'i Office _Southern qh . .

gaintreihe Defendan.2 'State prosecutors 41so have been criticized:kite Palm Beach Police . , . . . • . : ill •:' Lfr ' • Chief,* 'faulted the Slate Altorper.s hailing of these cases as uldighty;uttusual" and called fbr . II i • 1 I:i • vitt i •;'• ' • '' ; , ' polieutoksr-Ler. yi of le

ally J.A. 10960-10972 (the district court's factual findings regarding the existence of a racially hostile work environment); Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa, 539 U.S. 90, 101-02, 123 S. Ct. 2148, 156 L. Ed. 2d 84 (2003) (allowing the use of circumstantial evidence to show that race was a motivating fact

001 be relied upon as definitively accurate. Before relying on any data this system supplies. it should be independently verified. For Secretary of Slate documents, the focloyring data is for information purposes only and is not an official record. Declined copies may be obtained from that autnidual s