Epstein Secrets

those individuals are not the ones who at the time reviewed the evidence available for trial and assessed the likelihood of success. Respectfully, R. Alexander Acosta Former U.S. Attorney Sothem District of Florida EFTA00180304 Case !:i:08-cv 1 2 3 80119-KAM Document 180 Entered UNITED STATES SOUTHERN

kelihood of success. Respectfully, R. Alexander Acosta Former U.S. Attorney Sothem District of Florida

Blvd., Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Fax: 561 697 2383 Counsel for Plaintiffiane Doe Douglas M. McIntosh, Esq. Jason A. McGrath, Esq. McIntosh, Sawran, Peltz & Cartaya, P.A. Centurion Tower 1601 Forum Place, Suite 1110 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Fax. 561 682-3206 Counsel for Defenda

eement"). Thank you for confirming our position that the December modification proposal is not part of the Agreement. As expressed by U.S. Attorney Acosta in his December IV. 2007 letter, the unorthodox use of a civil restitution statute in a federal plea agreement, which resulted in state charges agai

correct the error promptly. Accordingly, if you have any substantive objections to the letter, please advise me by tomorrow afternoon. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By Assistant United United States Attorney cc: Chief, Northern Division EFTA00183564 U.S. Department of Justice Unit

can exercise his discretion in determining the destiny and security of himself, other people, and the Nation." Stew ex rel. Miami Herald Pub. Co.l McIntosh, 340 So.2d 904, 908 (Fla.1977). In serving the right of each cit- Page 2 izen to be informed, judicial openness, of which the press is an instrume

informed. Petitioner's rights under the CVRA have not been violated. Therefore, her emergency petition should be denied. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA By: Assistant U.S. Attorney UNITED STATES KITORNEY Attorney for Respondent CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy

be denied. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA By: Assistant U.S. Attorney UNITED STATES KITO

e press have a fundamental right of access to all judicial proceedings," however, this right is not absolute. State ex rel. Miami Herald Pub. Co. McIntosh, 340 So.2d at 908-9. In Bar- ron, the court took the occasion to establish the standards upon which the presumption of openness may be overcome whe