Epstein Secrets

nce from your Office has indicated a belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, pg 2; 2. Whether Mr. Epstein can contend that the statutory provisions of 2255 in effect at the time of the offense (eg 2004-5)

est that the plaintiff was injured, see United States v Scheidt, supra (finding each to be a separate element) and the letter from Mr Acosta to Mr. Starr, supra December 4, 2007 letter at pg 2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the injury element under the NPA; 4. Whether the 6 year civil stat

AUS US Atty ice WPB Re Jeffrey Epstein Deal We write this letter to renew our request that the United States Attorney's Office provide us, as Mr Epstein's c

P-013504 to P-013507). The entry here reads: "File folder labeled `Mtg w/ Ken Starr, RAA, JS, Drew' containing handwritten notes by A. Villafalla." Kenn Starr, of course, is a defense attorney who represented defendant Epstein. Recording information provided by a defense attorney is not part of any governm

3 of the supplemental privilege log (DE 216-1), with regard to Suppl. Box #3 P-013342 to P-013350. The entry reads: "File folder entitled `12/05/07 Starr to containing drafts of 11/30/07 letters from A. to K. Starr and from J. Lefkowitz re performance and victim notification with handwritten notes a

t any opportunity for withholding adjudication or sentencing, and without probation or community control in lieu of imprisonment; and Page 2 of 5 US Atty Cor_0084 EFTA00184712 Case 9 08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-61 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 6 of 8 (b) following the term of imprisonmen

pondence from your Office has indicated a belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see Acosta letter to Starr, December 4, 2007, pg 2. 2. Whether Mr. Epstein can contend that the statutory provisions of 2255 in effect at the time of the offense (eg 2004-5)

AUSA US Atty ice WPB Re Jeffrey Epstein Dear We write this letter to renew our request that the United States Attorney's Office provide us, as Mr Epstein's